2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V alloy in a wide range of strain rates and temperatures under tensile, compressive and flexural loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The constitutive relationship is described using the traction separation law. 22 The expression is Equations (18) and (19).…”
Section: Modeling For the Interface Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The constitutive relationship is described using the traction separation law. 22 The expression is Equations (18) and (19).…”
Section: Modeling For the Interface Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, further investigation can be conducted on the influence of temperature on other machining damages. Moreover, scholars have revealed that temperature also has a certain effect on the processing behavior of Ti 17,18 . The above researches have proved that temperature is an important factor affecting the machining damage of stacks, and it is necessary to further explore the relationship between the temperature of the processing area and the quality of drilling of stacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Kotkunde [27] and Tao [27,28] analyzed the predictive accuracy of the JC, Fields-Backofen (FB) [29], KHL, a modified version of the JC and mechanical threshold stress (MTS) equations for Ti-6AL-4 V alloys. Recently, Prakash et al [30] studied the flow stress for the same alloy but at high strain rate and high temperature by tensile, compressive and flexural loads. The modified JC and the JC models were employed to predict Al7075 behavior at increased temperatures; however, modified JC models have better predictions due to adjustments in the temperature term [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discrepancies might not solely stem from the material's viscoelastic properties but could also be attributed to non-uniform axial forces or deformations induced by stress wave propagation or uneven viscous stress coupling. Any of these scenarios might result in a flawed perception of viscoelastic properties, suggesting that conventional SHPB experiments might lack the rigor to quantitatively study material viscoelastic effects [10][11][12] or qualitatively ascertain if a material exhibits viscoelastic traits [13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%