Background: echocardiographic evaluation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tAVI) includes estimation of effective orifice area (eoA). eoA calculation depends on sub-valvular stroke volume (sV), which depends on sub-valvular diameter and velocity time integral (VtI). the Medtronic CoreValve area changes throughout its length. we aimed to (i) compare sV at two sites of flow acceleration: 'pre-stent ' and 'in-stent, pre-valve', (ii) assess effects of possible differences in sub-valvular sV on eoA, and (iii) assess agreement of measurement of eoA calculation after CoreValve tAVI.Methods: we studied 43 patients after CoreValve implantation. All had transthoracic echocardiography 5-7 days after tAVI. sub-valvular sV was measured 'pre-stent ' and 'in-stent, pre-valve'. Measurement agreement was assessed by root mean square (RMs) differences and Bland-Altman analyses.Results: sV was consistently higher 'in-stent, pre-valve' compared with 'pre-stent' (62±20ml vs. 53±19ml, p<0.001), so that eoA was correspondingly larger using 'in-stent, pre-valve' measurements (1.7±0.5cm 2 vs. 1.4±0.5cm 2 , p<0.001). Betweenobserver RMs difference for calculation of eoA was higher 'in-stent, pre-valve' compared to 'pre-stent' (0.53 cm 2 vs. 0.23cm 2 , difference from zero 0.17, p=0.002). though sub-valvular diameter measurements were variable, VtI variability was additionally higher 'in-stent, pre-valve' compared to 'pre-stent' (0.42cm vs. 0.6cm, difference from zero -1.74, p=0.11).Conclusion: Calculation of eoA after CoreValve tAVI is highly dependent on sub-valvular sample position. eoA may be underestimated using 'pre-stent' sV, and overestimated using 'in-stent, pre-valve' sV. limitations in sV reproducibility suggests eoA should be used in conjunction with other indices of valve function in serial assessment of CoreValve function following tAVI.