The methods of making more accurate measurements in arcjet wind tunnels in the real-gas regime than have been achieved up to the present time are explored by reviewing, comparing, and interpreting the existing experimental methodologies and obtained data. The inaccuracies of the conventional method of determining enthalpy and ow uniformity are rst pointed out. The extent and consequences of ow contamination by copper vapor are next examined. Then the data obtained through spectroscopic determination of ow enthalpies, Doppler velocimetry using laser-induced uorescence, and species concentration determination using mass spectrometry are reviewed. The discrepancies between the measured and calculated ow velocities and species concentrations are pointed out and a possible explanation is given.Nomenclature A = nozzle cross-sectional area, m 2 C p = speci c heat at constant pressure C v = speci c heat at constant volume D = diameter of constrictor, m d = diameter of model, m H = enthalpy, J/kg h i = chemical energy of species i, J/mol L = length of constrictor, m n i = species concentration, mol/kg p = pressure, Pa q Ç = stagnation-point heat transfer rate, W/m 2 r = radial distance, m T = heavy particle temperature, K T e = electron temperature, K T v = vibrational temperature, K U = freestream velocity, m/s u = velocity in radial direction, m/s v = vibrational quantum number y = distance normal to wall, m = speci c heat ratio C p /C v = density, kg/m 3 = vibrational energy, J/kg Subscripts av = average c = centerline e = boundary-layer edge s = pitot total 0 = reservoir = freestream * = nozzle throat