2016
DOI: 10.21152/1750-9548.10.2.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Control and High-Lift Performance for Flying-Wing Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Configurations by inserting slots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar behavior was observed in the study of Ali and Chadwick [45]. Hence, it can be concluded that the present numerical model is sufficient to study the aerodynamic performance of lambda wing models.…”
Section: B Validationsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar behavior was observed in the study of Ali and Chadwick [45]. Hence, it can be concluded that the present numerical model is sufficient to study the aerodynamic performance of lambda wing models.…”
Section: B Validationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The present study examines the aerodynamic characteristics of constant and non-constant LE sweep angle lambda wing configurations using OpenFOAM for various AOA. The parameters such as coefficients of lift ( ), drag ( ) and pitching moments ( ) are compared with the experimental data of Ali and Chadwick for validation [45]. coefficient reduces with an increase in AOA, and they exhibit a larger deviation from experimental data at higher AOA.…”
Section: B Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the numerical results are compared with experimental or analytical results for validation. As the current UCAV model lacks experimental results at the moment, for validation, the generic lambda wing models at the low speed [21] and SACCON, DLR-F17E models at high speed [50] are compared with their corresponding experimental results following the same numerical approach adapted for the present UCAV model. As shown in (Fig.…”
Section: Validation Of the Numerical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UCAV configurations used in military applications must operate in a high-threat environment with sufficient operating range, endurance, and manoeuvrability which is appropriate for long-distance attacks, great depth, and stealth penetrations. Most of the UCAV conceptual designs available in the literature [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] are tailless flying wing configurations with a low to moderate aspect ratio (AR), internal weapon carriage, concealed propulsion systems, absence of high lift devices, and moderate to high leading-edge (LE) sweep angle edge-aligned wings (40 ≤ Λ ≤ 60 deg) [21,22]. However, the design of UCAV configurations is a complex task because it requires a high level of integration within the subsystems combined with vorticial flow structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%