39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2001
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow control of a sharp-edged airfoil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An extensive survey of the literature in this area reveals that only Wu et al (1998) have considered both f SL and f wake in their studies. In contrast, other studies of post-stall separation control account for f wake but do not consider f SL ( 2001; Miranda, Telionis & Zeiger 2001;Chen & Beeler 2002). Finally, a majority of studies that have examined massively separated flow past airfoils with deflected flaps (e.g.…”
Section: Constituents Of a Separated Airfoil Flowmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An extensive survey of the literature in this area reveals that only Wu et al (1998) have considered both f SL and f wake in their studies. In contrast, other studies of post-stall separation control account for f wake but do not consider f SL ( 2001; Miranda, Telionis & Zeiger 2001;Chen & Beeler 2002). Finally, a majority of studies that have examined massively separated flow past airfoils with deflected flaps (e.g.…”
Section: Constituents Of a Separated Airfoil Flowmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The scaling for Kármán vortex shedding due to Roshko (1954) is f wake ∼ U ∞ /W wake , where W wake is the characteristic width of the wake, and this scaling is fundamentally different from that of f sep . In many studies (Wu et al 1998;Miranda et al 2001), W wake is assumed to be equal to c sin(α) where c is the airfoil chord length and α is the angle of attack. In cases where the separation extends over a significant portion of the airfoil (or a flap), it has been customary to assume L sep = c (Bar-Sever 1989; Seifert et al 1993;Ravindran 1999;Wygnanski 2000;Darabi & Wygnanski 2002;Funk et al 2002;Postl et al 2004), but this might significantly overestimate the correct length scale in cases where the wake vortex shedding dominates the dynamics.…”
Section: Scaling Of Characteristic Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f is the vortex-shedding frequency and L′ is a characteristic length, defined as the projection of the model perpendicular to the freestream (Miranda, 2005) (Fig. 8A).…”
Section: Aerodynamic Force Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the change in structural resonance from benchtop measurements is larger than the change in shedding frequency as given in Table 2, this suggests that the membrane's first resonance mode may not be excited by the fluid. It has been speculated by other work that the shedding frequency will lock on to the natural resonant frequency of the membrane (Miranda et al, 2005;Rojratsirikul et al, 2010;Scott et al, 2012;Timpe et al, 2013). This is due to the larger density of the structure relative to the surrounding fluid behaving as a moving wall.…”
Section: Vortex Sheddingmentioning
confidence: 96%