2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow cytometric analysis of myelomonocytic cells by a pattern recognition approach is sensitive and specific in diagnosing myelodysplastic syndrome and related marrow diseases: Emphasis on a global evaluation and recognition of diagnostic pitfalls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
84
2
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
84
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…By applying the principles of information geometry in the current study, we corroborated observations that have been made in previous studies involving subjective interpretation of myeloid immunophenotypes, including substantial overlap in the immunophenotypic signatures between benign granulopoiesis and the granulopoiesis of low grade MDS and the tendency of higher grade MDS (RAEB and RCMD) to separate immunophenotypically from benign cases (5,6,15). This finding was further validated by the observation that MDS cases with morphologic dysgranulopoiesis showed greater separation from benign cases than did MDS cases without morphologic dysgranulopoiesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By applying the principles of information geometry in the current study, we corroborated observations that have been made in previous studies involving subjective interpretation of myeloid immunophenotypes, including substantial overlap in the immunophenotypic signatures between benign granulopoiesis and the granulopoiesis of low grade MDS and the tendency of higher grade MDS (RAEB and RCMD) to separate immunophenotypically from benign cases (5,6,15). This finding was further validated by the observation that MDS cases with morphologic dysgranulopoiesis showed greater separation from benign cases than did MDS cases without morphologic dysgranulopoiesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Documentation of abnormal, imbalanced, or dyssynchronous myeloid maturation patterns has been a key focus of most studies on the use of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in the diagnosis of MDS (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(14)(15). This type of analysis generally has a substantial subjective component, requiring an individual user to weigh qualitatively the expression patterns among several markers, to weigh the importance of maturational shifts or myeloblast increases, and to render conclusions regarding the sometimes subtle deviations and between observed and expected patterns yielded by these marker combinations on examination of serial 2D histograms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem may be further complicated by decreased CD15 expression on granulocytes and substantially increased CD15 expression on mononcytes, an alteration often observed in MDS bone marrow cells. 22 Although our stringent three-step gating strategy showed greater utility in separating granulocytes from monocytes as compared to the CD15/SSC and FSC/SSC two-step gating recommended by others, 8 in some cases, especially the cases with severe granulocytic dysplasia and/or CMML, a small number of monocytes were inseparable from granulocytes and were included in the granulocyte gate. Monocytes have a CD16 -CD66b -immunophenotype and can be mistaken for cells with a PNH + phenotype.…”
Section: Cd66bmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…22 In brief, the bone marrow samples were analyzed for aberrant antigenic expression or altered expression in blasts, differentiating myeloid cells and monocytes according to our previously published protocol and analytic approaches. 22 The FCM results were correlated with the morphological and cytogenetic findings to render a final diagnosis and disease classification. In cases of AML, expression of myeloperoxidase, Tdt, cytoplasmic CD22, and cytoplasmic CD3 was assessed.…”
Section: Bone Marrow Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation