2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-013-0767-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow cytometric and karyological analyses of Calendula species from Iberian Peninsula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the number of studies published on the evolution in the genus Calendula, some ambiguity remains about chromosome numbers and ploidy levels. In our study, genome sizes between 2.68 ± 0.08 and 2.90 ± 0.05 pg/2C were found for the nine C. officinalis cultivars tested, which is a bit lower than the 2.97 ± 0.08 pg mentioned in literature (Nora et al, 2013). Intraspecific variations of 2C values in plants is subject to controversy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the number of studies published on the evolution in the genus Calendula, some ambiguity remains about chromosome numbers and ploidy levels. In our study, genome sizes between 2.68 ± 0.08 and 2.90 ± 0.05 pg/2C were found for the nine C. officinalis cultivars tested, which is a bit lower than the 2.97 ± 0.08 pg mentioned in literature (Nora et al, 2013). Intraspecific variations of 2C values in plants is subject to controversy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Higher chromosome numbers are found in C. arvenisis (2n = 4x = 44) and in C. palaestina and C. pachysperma (2n = ± 85), which are probably autopolyploids of C. arvensis (Heyn et al, 1974). The differences in chromosome number, karyotype, genome size and ploidy level are the result of high levels of hybridization, chromosome losses and dysploidy (Nora et al, 2013), which makes taxonomy in Calendula very difficult. Nora et al (2013) used genome sizes and chromosome numbers for the evaluation of evolutionary relationships and taxonomy in Calendula.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genome size of different animals e.g Dairy goat (Fletcher et al, 2013) as well as different, plants has been estimated by flow cytometry like Pinus (O'Brien et al, 1996), Lemon (Iannelli et al, 1998), Arachis hypogeal (Temsch and Greilhuber, 2000), Musa (Roux et al, 2003), Atriplex halimus (Walker et al, 2005), Consolea (Negron-Ortiz, 2007), Vicia faba (Kovarova et al, 2007) Cactus (Lema-Ruminska, 2011), Coffea (Clarindo et al, 2012), Calendula species (Nora et al, 2013), Eryngium (Tavares et al, 2013), Lathyrus (Ochatt et al, 2013) and Phragmites austalis (Nakagawa et al, 2013).…”
Section: Ajabsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On an evolutionary scale, hybridization in Calendula has been considered one of the main factors driving diversification and formation of new species in the genus (Heyn & Joel 1983;Nora et al 2013), but the threat of hybridization to the conservation of rare species of Calendula has never been considered before. Hybridization between C. maritima and two other species, C. fulgida Raf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%