2011
DOI: 10.4236/jbpc.2011.22013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow cytometric investigation on degradation of macro-DNA by common laboratory manipulations

Abstract: The degree and characteristics of physical degradation of macro-DNA molecules by common laboratory manipulations are reported. With linearized lambda-phage viral DNA as the model DNA, fragmentation of macro-DNA by various indispensable laboratory manipulations were investigated using a high sensitivity flow cytometric setup. Investigated manipulations included pipetting, vortexing, rocking, freezethawing, ultrasonication and ultrafiltration. "Exhaustive counting" of the intact lambda DNA molecules following su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculations by Vanapalli et al have proven that the pull of a DNA molecule stuck in two vortices at the same time is sufficient to break the strand in half and that this is the primary cause of fragmentation under most hydrodynamic conditions (Vanapalli et al, 2006). During sample processing fragmentation occurs over time until all DNA molecules have been degraded to a length where all fragments are short enough to remain within a single eddy, which is consistent with experimental results with commonly used laboratory equipment, such as vortex mixers and pipettes (Yoo et al, 2011), and results suggest that the breakage rate is a function of the shear rate rather than the shear stress (Bowman and Davidson, 1972;Meacle et al, 2007).…”
Section: Physical Stresssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Calculations by Vanapalli et al have proven that the pull of a DNA molecule stuck in two vortices at the same time is sufficient to break the strand in half and that this is the primary cause of fragmentation under most hydrodynamic conditions (Vanapalli et al, 2006). During sample processing fragmentation occurs over time until all DNA molecules have been degraded to a length where all fragments are short enough to remain within a single eddy, which is consistent with experimental results with commonly used laboratory equipment, such as vortex mixers and pipettes (Yoo et al, 2011), and results suggest that the breakage rate is a function of the shear rate rather than the shear stress (Bowman and Davidson, 1972;Meacle et al, 2007).…”
Section: Physical Stresssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Several studies have repeatedly frozen and thawed DNA samples, generally observing exponential degradation. An approximately 10% degradation of lambda DNA in Tris-EDTA buffer was observed after 1 freeze-thaw, and 75% degradation was observed after 20 freeze thaws 39 . An exponential fit modeled this process relatively closely (% intact DNA = 0.9484*e −0.068*freeze-thaws ).…”
Section: Working Storage (~Accessed Multiple Times Per Year)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…With a relatively rapid single pipetting action through a 1 mL tip, 70% of long lambda phage DNA was fragmented. Slower and gentler pipetting still led to more than 50% of lambda DNA being fragmented 39 . This is somewhat concerning given liquid handling often uses even smaller 200, 20, and 2 μL tips that would result in higher shear forces.…”
Section: Short-term Storage For Dynamic Handling Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the level of cfDNA association with other protein complexes should also be assessed; (4) Necrotic DNA may be digested into DNA fragments that resemble apoptotic DNA; (5) Extracellular DNA degradation and digestion activities may fluctuate over time (e.g., endonucleases can be released by dead or dying cells, and activity may increase in response to an increase in cfDNA levels 81 ); (6) cfDNA may be taken up by cells or adhere to cell surfaces, and there may differences in the behavior of apoptotic and necrotic DNA in this respect; (7) Various processes can inhibit the release of DNA, while other processes can speed up the degradation of DNA; (8) In addition to apoptosis and necrosis, various other forms of cellular demise can contribute to cfDNA release; (9) Different types of cell death result in the presence of differently sized cfDNA populations. As different preanalytical steps differently affect different cfDNA size populations (e.g., size bias of extraction kits 29,82 and mechanical vulnerability of long fragments during processing 83 ), this can potentially affect cfDNA measurements 29 ; (10) It is difficult to determine the amount of apoptotic and necrotic cells that have completely disintegrated and/or newly emerged between incubation periods; (11) Apoptosis and necrosis can occur in the same cell 76 .…”
Section: Limitations Of This Study and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%