2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12275-021-1443-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow cytometric monitoring of the bacterial phenotypic diversity in aquatic ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we found that the REU scores of OLP patients were associated with increase of Rothia in saliva increased and decrease of Porphyromonas on buccal mucosa, indicating that the change in the proportion of Rothia and Porphyromonas may signify the degree of severity of OLP. Studies of dental plaque and saliva from healthy and diseased subjects have identified the genus Rothia as commensal member of human oral microbiota (Baker et al, 2021; Kang et al, 2006). The most focused member of the genus Porphyromonas is Porphyromonas gingivalis associated with human periodontitis (Darveau, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we found that the REU scores of OLP patients were associated with increase of Rothia in saliva increased and decrease of Porphyromonas on buccal mucosa, indicating that the change in the proportion of Rothia and Porphyromonas may signify the degree of severity of OLP. Studies of dental plaque and saliva from healthy and diseased subjects have identified the genus Rothia as commensal member of human oral microbiota (Baker et al, 2021; Kang et al, 2006). The most focused member of the genus Porphyromonas is Porphyromonas gingivalis associated with human periodontitis (Darveau, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenotypic diversity was assessed by partitioning the denoised data from the FSC × FITC plot into 100 × 100 bins, based on previous research ( Hong et al, 2021b ). The R software (version 3.6.2) with identical scripts as those used in a previous study ( Hong et al, 2021a ) was used to process the data. The alpha diversity index (Shannon’s diversity index) and beta diversity were calculated using the R package “vegan” with the FCM feature tables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%