2003
DOI: 10.1002/dc.10298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow cytometric S‐phase fraction as a complementary biological parameter for the cytological grading of non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma

Abstract: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a technique that can overcome tissue-sampling disaggregation problems related to DNA flow cytometry analysis. The aim of this study, with long-term follow-up (median, 72 mo), was to investigate the prognostic value of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), and additionally, the relevance of SPF in the grading of NHLs, using FNAC. The series comprised 76 patients with NHL (32 indolent and 44 aggressive tumors, including 14 B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,69,70 Previous reports indicate that B-CLPDs displaying a low proliferative rate correspond to relatively indolent, low-grade tumors, while B-CLPDs with a higher proliferative rate typically (Ͼ 10%) show an aggressive clinical course. 23,25,28 In line with these observations, we found a clear association between higher percentages of S ϩ G2/M cells and both adverse prognostic features (eg, advanced patient performance status, disease stage, high LDH serum levels, and presence of thrombocytopenia), progressive disease, and a shorter overall survival for the whole B-CLPD group as well as for a specific diagnostic subgroups of the disease such as MCL.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3,69,70 Previous reports indicate that B-CLPDs displaying a low proliferative rate correspond to relatively indolent, low-grade tumors, while B-CLPDs with a higher proliferative rate typically (Ͼ 10%) show an aggressive clinical course. 23,25,28 In line with these observations, we found a clear association between higher percentages of S ϩ G2/M cells and both adverse prognostic features (eg, advanced patient performance status, disease stage, high LDH serum levels, and presence of thrombocytopenia), progressive disease, and a shorter overall survival for the whole B-CLPD group as well as for a specific diagnostic subgroups of the disease such as MCL.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Interestingly, upon comparing the DNA index (DI) of aneuploid cases, significant differences were observed between B-CLL cases (DI of 1.05 Ϯ 0.04) in comparison with MCL (DI of 1.6 Ϯ 0.4; P Ͻ .001), FL (DI of 1.3 Ϯ 0.4; P Ͻ .001), DLBCL (DI of 1.4 Ϯ 0.4; P Ͻ .001), and BL (DI of 1.4 Ϯ 0.2; P ϭ .01) patients, in line with previous observations. 21,24,28,29,54 In addition, FL cases also showed a significantly lower DNA index than MCL cases (P ϭ .02). Among B-CLL patients, DNA aneuploidy was associated with a higher percentage of S ϩ G2/M-phase cells (1% Ϯ 0.7% vs 0.5% Ϯ 0.7%; P ϭ .002) as previously reported.…”
Section: Impact Of Common Recurrent Cytogenetic Abnormalities In the mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neither FSC nor CD71i significantly differentiated follicular lymphoma (FL) grades. A comparison of all FLs (grades [1][2][3] and non-FL high-grade lymphomas (Burkitt lymphoma [BL] and large B-cell lymphoma [LBCL]) showed significant differences in CD71i (P < .001) and FSC (P = .021). Differences were significant in CD71i and FSC between FL and LBCL (P < .001) but not between FL and BL.…”
Section: Low-and 30 High-grade Cd10+ Bcell Lymphomas Forward Light Smentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Estimation of proliferative index as a marker of tumor aggressiveness has long been known. Several methods to assess proliferative fraction of tumor cells have been identified, of which flow cytometric determination of S-phase fraction gained most popularity (Pinto et al, 2003). Ki67 is a nuclear antigen that is expressed in mid G1, S, G2 and M phase of the cell cycle (Gerdes et al, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%