2010
DOI: 10.2110/jsr.2010.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow-Deposit Interaction in Submarine Lobes: Insights from Outcrop Observations and Realizations of a Process-Based Numerical Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
107
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6). This variation is also documented in the Tanqua depocenter (Rozman, 2000;Prélat et al, 2009;Groenenberg et al, 2010) and is interpreted to relate to differences in flow processes in distal frontal versus distal lateral run outs (Spychala et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Discussion Units A/b B/c and D/ementioning
confidence: 66%
“…6). This variation is also documented in the Tanqua depocenter (Rozman, 2000;Prélat et al, 2009;Groenenberg et al, 2010) and is interpreted to relate to differences in flow processes in distal frontal versus distal lateral run outs (Spychala et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Discussion Units A/b B/c and D/ementioning
confidence: 66%
“…by Groenenberg et al (2010) from process-based numerical modelling of lobes, who suggested that 413 depositional relief of preceding lobes could help to focus these types of flow into distal areas. 414…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cabrillo National Monument area is interpreted by Fleming (2010) to represent four lobe elements within the distal part of Complex 3 (Fleming, 2010). However, rapid lateral thickness changes occur at the bed-scale (Figure 10), which is not typical of distal lobe models but has been document in other recent outcrop studies (Walker & Mutti, 1973;Ricci-Lucchi, 1975;Shanmugam & Moiola, 1988;Lien et al, 2003;Prélat et al, 2009;Groenenberg et al, 2010;Etienne et al, 2012;Spychala et al, 2015;Fonnesu et al, 2016;.…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Depositional models and outcrop studies for submarine lobe deposition generally display a decreasing sand content, amalgamation, and bed thickness from axis to margin/fringe (Walker & Mutti, 1973;Ricci-Lucchi, 1975;Shanmugam & Moiola, 1988;Sullivan et al, 2000;Deptuck et al, 2008;Jegou et al, 2008;Prelat et al, 2009;Groenenberg et al, 2010;Etienne et al, 2012;Spychala et al, 2015;Fonnesu et al, 2017). My results confirm that sandstone bed thickness decreases and mudstone content increases from proximal to distal for unconfined and confined 18 lobes ( Figure 7).…”
Section: Lobe Sub-environments and Effective Confinement: Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%