1994
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<0366:fdcata>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Distortion Calculations and Their Application in HEXMAX

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that the EC method is more sensitive to flow distortion than the ID method 21 which suggests that biases in EC-derived fluxes could be large. Biases in the EC fluxes can be estimated by comparison with the (corrected) ID fluxes, where available.…”
Section: Flux Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the EC method is more sensitive to flow distortion than the ID method 21 which suggests that biases in EC-derived fluxes could be large. Biases in the EC fluxes can be estimated by comparison with the (corrected) ID fluxes, where available.…”
Section: Flux Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tilt angle of the wind vector was on average 2-3", upward for instruments mounted above the boom and downward for instruments below (DeCosmo, 1991;Oost et al, 1994).…”
Section: Coping With Flow Distortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of the "up-down" method to a set of pairs of sequential data runs with the sonic anemometer in turn "up" (above) and "down" (below the boom) yielded wind stress values for the two groups that were equal within lo%, whereas with only the tilt correction there was a systematic difference of 40% between the "ups" and "downs" (Smith et al, 1992;Oost et al, 1994). The ellipsoid correction was applied to the above-mentioned sonic anemometer and to a pressure anemometer, for which the flow distortion was smaller to begin with.…”
Section: Coping With Flow Distortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other issues such as motion correction and airflow can also influence shipboard flux measurement (Landwehr et al, 2015). An additional complication is the generation of turbulence by the interaction of airflow with the vessel's structure, such as the leading edge of the hull and/or smaller support structures (Oost et al, 1994). The effect of this on the apparent gas flux is not well known, nor is whether advected atmospheric turbulence is affected by flow distortion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%