2014
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a3968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Diversion versus Traditional Endovascular Coiling Therapy: Design of the Prospective LARGE Aneurysm Randomized Trial

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:The goal of aneurysm treatment is occlusion of an aneurysm without morbidity or mortality. Using well-established, traditional endovascular techniques, this is generally achievable with a high level of safety and efficacy. These techniques involve either constructive treatment of the aneurysm (coils with or without an intravascular stent) or deconstruction (coil occlusion) of the aneurysm and the parent artery. While established as safe and efficacious, the constructive treatment of larg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[33][34][35][36] The PRET trial had several limitations. Operators could not be blinded to coil type.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35][36] The PRET trial had several limitations. Operators could not be blinded to coil type.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be partially explained by the increased morbidity and mortality associated with the treatment of giant and complex aneurysms. Future studies, including the LARGE randomized clinical trial, which will compare endovascular coiling, stent assisted coiling, and flow diversion for large and giant aneurysms,74 are necessary and may help define the optimal treatment strategies for these patients.…”
Section: Future Advances and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized control trial is being carried out to compare the aneurysmal cure rate and its recurrence rate after traditional coiling and flow diversion. [23] FDs show promise as the simplest and probably the best endovascular modalities available at present; however, robust long-term results are still awaited to support their use in giant aneurysms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%