Type-B Aortic Dissection (TBAD) is cardiovascular disease in which a tear develops in the intimal layer of the descending aorta, allowing pressurised blood to delaminate the intimal and medial layers to form a true and false lumen. In medically managed patients, long-term aneurysmal dilatation of the false lumen is considered virtually inevitable and is associated with poorer disease outcomes. The pathophysiological mechanisms driving false lumen dilatation are not yet understood, though haemodynamic factors are believed to play a key role. Recent analysis via Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and 4D-Flow MRI have demonstrated links between flow helicity, oscillatory wall shear stress and aneurysmal dilatation of the false lumen. In this study, we compare simulations using the gold-standard three-dimensional, three-component inlet velocity profile (3D IVP) extracted from 4DMR data with flow-matched flat and through-plane profiles that remain widely used in the absence of 4DMR. Furthermore, we assess the impact of 4DMR imaging errors on the flow solution by scaling the 3D IVP components to the degree of imaging error observed in previous studies. We demonstrate that secondary inlet flows affect the distribution of oscillatory shear and helicity throughout the FL, and that even the 3D IVP exhibited notable differences in helicity and oscillatory shear when modulated to account for imaging errors. These results illustrate that the quality of inlet velocity conditions in simulations of TBAD may greatly affect their clinical value, and efforts to further enhance their patient-specific accuracy are warranted.