Operations Research Proceedings 1998 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-58409-1_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Improvement and Network Flows with Fixed Costs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prove a hardness reduction for Í Á under the assumption È AEÈ using a reduction from Set-Cover. We need a somewhat different proof than the one reported in (Krumke et al, 1998) to account for the extra restriction imposed by Í Á . For our purposes it is convenient to formulate the set cover problem as follows.…”
Section: Theorem 21 There Is a Constantmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We prove a hardness reduction for Í Á under the assumption È AEÈ using a reduction from Set-Cover. We need a somewhat different proof than the one reported in (Krumke et al, 1998) to account for the extra restriction imposed by Í Á . For our purposes it is convenient to formulate the set cover problem as follows.…”
Section: Theorem 21 There Is a Constantmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For the case of zero migration cost, DAHM can be formulated as a more specific problem that is a Fixed Charge Min Cost Flow (FCMCF). FCMCF is also NP-hard [66] but, compared to MIP, more efficient approximation methods have been developed [29] (FCMCF can be solved by MIP but not vice versa). We also show that DAHM is NP-hard by reducing an NP-hard sub-case of FCMCF to it.…”
Section: Cost Minimization Is Subject To the Following Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FCMCF [66] a graph G = (V, E) with nonnegative capacities capacity i and nonnegative costs w i for each edge i is given with the edge cost defined on each edge's flow f i as follows: w i = flow-cost i f i + fixed-charge i , when f i > 0 and w i = 0 when f i = 0. The question is whether there is a subset A ⊆ E of the edges of G such that the flow from the source to the sink in (V, A) is at least F and the cost is at most W .…”
Section: Cost Minimization Is Subject To the Following Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our setting, the objective function is indifferent to the quantity of flow on each edge, and only distinguishes between zero and non-zero flow (leading to either a fixed charge or a more involved function; see the next sections). The most closely related recent sources we have encountered in the literature on network design are [9,15,16,30]. The major difference with each of these is the fact that we also impose (a) side constraints on node flow, namely that it be equal to r ik or a k (see Equations (1) and (2)), as well as (b) acyclicity.…”
Section: Network Designmentioning
confidence: 99%