2007
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow measurements: Can several “Wrongs” make a “Right”?

Abstract: Although simple in design, the home flowmeter actually shows greater accuracy than might be expected when used repeatedly to study the flow rates of men. Simple flow devices such as this could be used in conjunction with voiding diaries to give a more representative picture of patients' day-to-day voiding function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“… Seven home uroflowmeters described in the literature: ( A ) Smith's device,8 ( B ) Streamtest cup,9 ( C ) PEL device,10 ( D ) Uflow Meter®,11, 27 ( E ) Peakometer,12–14 ( F ) P‐flow,16–19 and ( G ) Da Capo 20, 21…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… Seven home uroflowmeters described in the literature: ( A ) Smith's device,8 ( B ) Streamtest cup,9 ( C ) PEL device,10 ( D ) Uflow Meter®,11, 27 ( E ) Peakometer,12–14 ( F ) P‐flow,16–19 and ( G ) Da Capo 20, 21…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caffarel et al27 recruited 22 volunteers to perform two clinic flows and record home flows for two weeks using the Uflow Meter®. Bland Altman analysis showed considerable variation between the two clinic readings (mean difference = 2.5 ml/sec) whereas comparison of average Q max from multiple home flow recordings made during successive weeks showed little variation (mean difference = −0.2 ml/sec).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was a significant increase in Q max with each successive void 9. Caffarel et al16 have suggested the use of home flowmeters to obtain multiple flow rate readings to improve the reliability of flow rate measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%