2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-004-0079-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow of conducting liquid around two nonconducting particles in DC electromagnetic field and the electromagnetic migration force

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the previous results on the same diameter, 10) the flow direction is upward in the Case 1, however, the direction is opposite in Case 2. The penetrating flow was weaker in Case 3 configuration, because of the geometric reason.…”
Section: Em-flow State Around Two Particles In Com-supporting
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…According to the previous results on the same diameter, 10) the flow direction is upward in the Case 1, however, the direction is opposite in Case 2. The penetrating flow was weaker in Case 3 configuration, because of the geometric reason.…”
Section: Em-flow State Around Two Particles In Com-supporting
confidence: 54%
“…In the succeeding study, 10) it was reported that the em- flow around the particles influenced the em migration forces (Gc values). Although the contribution of the viscous stress is about 10 % of the em pressure, their dependence was significant in Case 1 and 2, however, the influence was weak in Case 3.…”
Section: Influence Of Em-flow States On the Gc Magnitudementioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations