SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 1987
DOI: 10.2118/16692-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow of Drilling Fluids Through Eccentric Annuli

Abstract: The eccentric annular flow of power-law and Bingham plastic fluids is analysed in this paper using a new method in which an eccentric annulus is represented by infinite concentric annuli with variable outer radii. For the case of power-law fluids, ana1ytical solutions of the shear stress and velocity profiles have been obtained which are valid over the entire eccentric annulus. For Bingham plastic fluids, the profiles have been obtained at the minimum and maximum dimension positions of the eccentric annulus, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the fluids of petroleum engineering are typically non-Newtonian in behavior, the studies of nonNewtonian fluid flow in eccentric annuli followed. Unfortunately, a number of investigators have built their eccentric annular flow studies on an equation of flow which is valid for a concentric annulus only and, therefore, have failed to obtain Contributed by the Petroleum Division and presented at the Thirteenth Annual Energy-Sources Technology Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, January 14-18, 1990 accurate results (Vaughn, 1965;Iyoho and Azar, 1981;Luo and Peden, 1987;Uner et al, 1989). However, Guckes (1975 numerically solved the equation of flow for the eccentric annulus and obtained a flow rate versus frictional pressure loss gradient relationship for the power law and the Bingham plastic-type non-Newtonian fluids for a limited range of eccentricities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the fluids of petroleum engineering are typically non-Newtonian in behavior, the studies of nonNewtonian fluid flow in eccentric annuli followed. Unfortunately, a number of investigators have built their eccentric annular flow studies on an equation of flow which is valid for a concentric annulus only and, therefore, have failed to obtain Contributed by the Petroleum Division and presented at the Thirteenth Annual Energy-Sources Technology Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, January 14-18, 1990 accurate results (Vaughn, 1965;Iyoho and Azar, 1981;Luo and Peden, 1987;Uner et al, 1989). However, Guckes (1975 numerically solved the equation of flow for the eccentric annulus and obtained a flow rate versus frictional pressure loss gradient relationship for the power law and the Bingham plastic-type non-Newtonian fluids for a limited range of eccentricities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical models that are based on introducing geometric parameters, such as Pipe Equivalent, generally delivered a poor result by greatly under-estimating the eccentricity effect. However, the Corrected Narrow Slot approach showed acceptable accuracy with comparison to other more sophisticated and M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 9 computationally expensive CFD models (Luo and Peden, 1990;Hashemian Adariani, 2005) for the presented geometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, results obtained from the Corrected Narrow Slot approach show reasonable accuracy for the presented geometry and in several cases performed even better than the simplified CFD models for eccentric annuli such as the models by Luo and Peden (1990) or Hashemian Adariani (2005). Theoretical models that are developed based on introducing geometric parameters such as the Pipe Equivalent approach (Ahmed et al, 2006) or the model by Sestak et al (2001) yielded very poor predictions and greatly underestimated the effect of eccentricity on pressure loss in a fully eccentric annulus.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations