A common assumption for annular flow used in the petroleum industry is that the inner pipe is concentrically located inside the flow geometry; however, this is rarely the case, even in slightly deviated wells. Considering the increasing number of directional and horizontal wells, the flow behavior of drilling fluids and cement slurries in eccentric annuli is becoming particularly important. In this paper, the governing equation of laminar flow is numerically solved using a finite differences technique to obtain velocity and viscosity profiles of yield-power law fluids (including Bingham plastic and power law fluids). Later, the velocity profile is integrated to obtain flow rate. Results show that the velocity profile is substantially altered in the annulus when the inner pipe is no longer concentric. Stagnant regions of flow were calculated in the low side of the hole. Viscosity profiles predicted for an eccentric annulus show how misleading the widely used single-value apparent viscosity term can be for non-Newtonian fluids. Profiles of velocity and viscosity in concentric and varying eccentric annuli are presented in 3-D and 2-D contour plots for a better visualization of annular flow. Frictional pressure loss gradient versus flow rate relationship data for power law fluids is generated using the computer program. Later, this data is fitted to obtain a simple equation utilizing regressional analysis, allowing for a quick calculation of friction pressure losses in eccentric annuli. For a given flow rate, frictional pressure loss is reduced as the inner pipe becomes eccentric. In most cases, about a 50-percent reduction in frictional pressure loss is predicted when the inner pipe lies on the low side.
IntroductionFlow of drilling fluids and cement slurries in annuli is an everyday event in petroleum engineering. In many of the calculation techniques used by petroleum engineers for prediction and design, the annular flow of fluids accounts for a significant part. However, a quick review of the present state of annular flow-related models readily reveals that our equations are for concentric annuli, and also are filled with approximations such as average velocity, average viscosity, and equivalent diameter. Here, through a basic study of non-Newtonian fluid flow in annuli, we will show how crude some of these approximations can be.A few researchers have already pointed out the importance of removing the assumption that the annulus is concentric. Heyda (1959) showed how dramatically the velocity profile of a laminar flowing Newtonian fluid would differ when the annulus is eccentric. Since the fluids of petroleum engineering are typically non-Newtonian in behavior, the studies of nonNewtonian fluid flow in eccentric annuli followed. Unfortunately, a number of investigators have built their eccentric annular flow studies on an equation of flow which is valid for a concentric annulus only and, therefore, have failed to obtain