In this paper, we address the issue of threshold yield pressure of yield-stress materials in rigid networks of interconnected conduits and porous structures subject to a pressure gradient. We compare the results as obtained dynamically from solving the pressure field to those obtained statically from tracing the path of the minimum sum of threshold yield pressures of the individual conduits by using the threshold path algorithms. We refute criticisms directed recently to our previous findings that the pressure field solution generally produces a higher threshold yield pressure than the one obtained by the threshold path algorithms. Issues related to the solidification of yield stress materials in their transition from fluid phase to solid state have also been investigated and assessed as part of the investigation of the yield point. Keywords: fluid mechanics; yield-stress; threshold yield pressure; threshold solidification pressure; network of conduits; porous media; threshold path algorithms.Recently, Balhoff et al [12] (henceforth called BRKMP) conducted a study in which they investigated this issue, among other issues, in detail and challenged the previous findings of SB. They argued that the threshold yield pressure obtained from solving the balance equations must be the same as the one obtained from the threshold path algorithms. They supported their theoretical reasoning by flow simulations in which they used a robust solving scheme based on the Newton-Raphson method in conjunction with the mass conservation and characteristic flow models. They even produced a mathematical proof using a graph theory framework