1995
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1995.0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Patterns Associated with the Steady Movement of a Solid/Liquid/Fluid Contact Line

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow field obtained from the 2D model agrees qualitatively with flow visualization from past dynamic wetting studies (Dussan V & Davis 1974;Savelski et al 1995). Results from the QP approach oppose our basic intuition that substrate drag should generate liquid flow which will contribute stresses that deform the fluid interface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The flow field obtained from the 2D model agrees qualitatively with flow visualization from past dynamic wetting studies (Dussan V & Davis 1974;Savelski et al 1995). Results from the QP approach oppose our basic intuition that substrate drag should generate liquid flow which will contribute stresses that deform the fluid interface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Although the slip model results in a flow akin to stagnation-point flow around the contact line, without a finite arrival time at the contact line of fluid particles along the interface, whereas pure rolling does result in such a finite arrival time, the confirmation by experiment of the velocity field in the inner region poses a formidable challenge. But the experiments of Savelski et al (1995) and Fuentes & Cerro (2005) show discrepancies with this hydrodynamic theory regarding the flow field even outside what would be expected to be the inner region. Also, in the numerical simulation of Sheng & Zhou (1992), a vortex is observed in the wedge near a contact line when applying free slip in the immediate vicinity of the contact line and no slip elsewhere.…”
Section: Flow Fieldmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…18,21 The role of contact angles in LB film deposition has been discussed. 22,23 Even though the specific contact angle values are slightly different, the general conclusion is that LB film deposition is possible if the dynamic contact angle is greater than 90 o during the down-stroke deposition or smaller than 90 o during the up-stroke deposition. In the current study, the measured contact angles of the hydrophilic substrate and Cu-Pc-C 8 LB film are 5 and 32 o , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%