1994
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(94)90126-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow redistribution due to void drift in two-phase flow in a multiple channel consisting of two subchannels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning experiments on the fluid transfer between subchannels, two-phase turbulent mixing (Petrunik and St. Pierre, 1970;Rudzinski et al, 1972;Singh and St. Pierre, 1973) and diversion cross-flow (Tapucu, 1977;Tapucu and Merilo, 1977;Tapucu et al, 1982) have been measured using a simpler channel made up of two-subchannels (i.e., two-subchannel system). Recently, Sadatomi et al (1994Sadatomi et al ( , 1995Sadatomi et al ( , 1996aSadatomi et al ( ,b, 1997, Sato et al (1996) and Kawahara et al (1997aKawahara et al ( ,b, 1998Kawahara et al ( , 2000a have studied two-phase fluid transfers for hydrodynamic equilibrium and non-equilibrium flows in geometrically simple two-subchannel systems, and measured the axial distributions of both gas and liquid flow rates and void fraction in each subchannel in order to extract each component from the total fluid transfer. So far, the data on the fluid transfer have been obtained only from two-subchannel systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning experiments on the fluid transfer between subchannels, two-phase turbulent mixing (Petrunik and St. Pierre, 1970;Rudzinski et al, 1972;Singh and St. Pierre, 1973) and diversion cross-flow (Tapucu, 1977;Tapucu and Merilo, 1977;Tapucu et al, 1982) have been measured using a simpler channel made up of two-subchannels (i.e., two-subchannel system). Recently, Sadatomi et al (1994Sadatomi et al ( , 1995Sadatomi et al ( , 1996aSadatomi et al ( ,b, 1997, Sato et al (1996) and Kawahara et al (1997aKawahara et al ( ,b, 1998Kawahara et al ( , 2000a have studied two-phase fluid transfers for hydrodynamic equilibrium and non-equilibrium flows in geometrically simple two-subchannel systems, and measured the axial distributions of both gas and liquid flow rates and void fraction in each subchannel in order to extract each component from the total fluid transfer. So far, the data on the fluid transfer have been obtained only from two-subchannel systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are few experimental data for the triangle tight lattice bundle to validate the code, especially for an inter-subchannel fluid transfer, which is one of key parameters in the subchannel analysis. The fluid transfer in a gas-liquid two-phase flow system has been modeled as three independent components; turbulent mixing, void drift and diversion cross-flow (9)(10)(11)(12) . Therefore, we have started an experimental program for studying each fluid transfer component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothetical force, in the absence of a pressure difference between two adjacent subchannels, is assumed to work in a way that the two-phase flows in a rod bundle tend to redistribute and attain the hydrodynamic equilibrium flow conditions in the downstream region. Magnitudes of the force were estimated by Ninokata et al 4) in relation to an extent of the deviation from the equilibrium flow conditions which were provided experimentally by Sadatomi et al 5) in the interconnected two circular subchannel test sections.…”
Section: Void Drift and Equilibrium Flow Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we evaluate these models based on the Kumamoto University data. 5,6) A representative of these models is due to Lahey and described in the textbook by Lahey and Moody. 1) The model is used in many subchannel analysis codes to include the void drift effects and is given by;…”
Section: Prediction By Available Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation