2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.04.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow structure of gas–liquid two-phase flow in an annulus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hibiki and Ishii (2002) derived a semitheoretical formulation from the interfacial area transport equation to predict the IAC in bubbly columns and forced convective bubbly flows. Ozar et al (2008) demonstrated that this correlation can be used with Ishii and Mishima's (1980) formulation for cap-bubbly and slug flow if the bubble fraction in the liquid slug is provided accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hibiki and Ishii (2002) derived a semitheoretical formulation from the interfacial area transport equation to predict the IAC in bubbly columns and forced convective bubbly flows. Ozar et al (2008) demonstrated that this correlation can be used with Ishii and Mishima's (1980) formulation for cap-bubbly and slug flow if the bubble fraction in the liquid slug is provided accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…steam-water, air-water, air-isopropanol solution, etc.). The experimental existing databases particular to IAC measurements have been provided extensively by Ishii (2001, 2002), Hibiki et al (2006) and Ozar et al (2008). Among the work presented in these publications, Akita and Yoshida (1974), Liu (1989), Serizawa et al (1991), Roy et al (1994) and Yun et al (2008) provide a valuable experimental database for different flow geometries and wide conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The value of C 1 represents the geometric effect of the flow channel and is 1.2 or 1.35 for pipes or rectangular channels, respectively (Ishii, 1977). For flow in an annulus, a C 1 value of 1.1 should be utilized (Ozar et al, 2008a) while Julia et al (2009) study of flow in a bundle geometry gives a range of 1.03-1.05 depending on the ratio of rod diameter to pitch distance. The effects of bubble size in bubbly flow were studied by Hibiki and Ishii (2002) and modified Eq.…”
Section: Drift-flux Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite a rather large number of studies, a number of questions are still open even for a single-phase flow. Studies of the local structure of the two-phase gas-liquid flow, and especially heat transfer in such flows, are very limited in the literature [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%