1977
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4686(77)85098-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow-through electrodes composed of parallel screens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The average weight area density (ω) of single screen was 0.065 g/cm 2 (measured value). The specific surface (S) area and void fraction (E) were calculated according to the following correlations [25]:…”
Section: Characterization and Preparation Of Amalgamated Copper Electmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average weight area density (ω) of single screen was 0.065 g/cm 2 (measured value). The specific surface (S) area and void fraction (E) were calculated according to the following correlations [25]:…”
Section: Characterization and Preparation Of Amalgamated Copper Electmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sioda (8,40) chose to plot the ratio lA~sl/]I[ as a complex function of (CE) which can be obtained by rearrangement of Eq. [17], [18], or [20].…”
Section: Potential Drop In Solution-filled Porous Electrodes--itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and k m is the mass transport coefficient, that in the case of F3DE, including carbon fiber materials, is determined by the following dependence [18]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exponent b reflects the hydrody namic mode of solution flow and can vary from 0.3 for a laminar flow to 0.8-1.0 for a turbulent flow. Experi mental data in the literature [18][19][20][21][22] In some works, e.g., in [23], it is suggested to calcu late the mass transport coefficient according to the formula containing the viscosity constant, diffusion coefficient, diameter of graphitized carbon fibers with deposited metal, and linear flow velocity. However, it is obvious that the effective diffusion coefficient [2], same as the mass transport coefficient, depends on the degree of mixing, i.e., also on the flow velocity and properties of the graphitized carbon material, which results in problems related to numeric calculations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%