1973
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112073001825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow through non-uniform gauze screens

Abstract: An experimental investigation into flow through shaped gauze screens in two-dimensional and axisymmetric situations has shown that there is disagreement between measured velocity profiles and those computed from the method developed by Elder (1958). This disagreement has been shown to be attributable to the retention of a term of second order in the basic linearization and comparisons between experimental and theoretical profiles omitting this term are in good agreement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Livesey and Laws used Elder's method to generate axisymmetric pipe profiles and results obtained during the course of their investigation can be found in Livesey & Laws (1973a, 1973b. Discrepancies between measured and calculated profiles lead to a re-examination of the original linearization described in Elder (1959).…”
Section: Patel (1966) Conducted An Experimental Investigation Into Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Livesey and Laws used Elder's method to generate axisymmetric pipe profiles and results obtained during the course of their investigation can be found in Livesey & Laws (1973a, 1973b. Discrepancies between measured and calculated profiles lead to a re-examination of the original linearization described in Elder (1959).…”
Section: Patel (1966) Conducted An Experimental Investigation Into Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrepancies between measured and calculated profiles lead to a re-examination of the original linearization described in Elder (1959). One of the basic assumptions of this linearization was that the screen angle was small, and Livesey & Laws (1973b) have shown that differences between profiles arise because Elder (1959) retained a second-order term [namely sly)] in a first-order theory.…”
Section: Patel (1966) Conducted An Experimental Investigation Into Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The η = 0.58 value was specified based on the correlation of Livesey and Laws [15], although this parameter will have little effect in this case, since the flow is almost normal to the screen. In the calculation, the BLs start at the channel inlet, so the inlet length was adjusted, so that the resulting BL profiles at the vane inlet location (with the vanes absent) matched the experimentally measured profiles as closely as possible.…”
Section: D Cfd Simulations 61 Case Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method of generating maximum shear with negligible decay downstream has to be selected. To generate a shear flow, various methods are available with their benefits and limitations well documented [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The turbulence intensity generated by the shear flow generator would suppress the role of secondary flows.…”
Section: Design Of the Shear Flow Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%