2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2009.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flower longevity and duration of pistil receptivity in high mountain plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…montanum for a more normal year, increases that number. Additionally, Steinacher & Wagner [18] found no altitudinal increase in potential flower longevity for a comparison of different species drawn from the alpine and nival-subnival zones in the European Alps. Overall, although the sample size is still very small, there seems to be relatively little evidence for an altitudinal increase in potential flower longevity measured in pollinator-excluded flowers in comparison for flower longevity measured in open-pollinated flowers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…montanum for a more normal year, increases that number. Additionally, Steinacher & Wagner [18] found no altitudinal increase in potential flower longevity for a comparison of different species drawn from the alpine and nival-subnival zones in the European Alps. Overall, although the sample size is still very small, there seems to be relatively little evidence for an altitudinal increase in potential flower longevity measured in pollinator-excluded flowers in comparison for flower longevity measured in open-pollinated flowers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, pollination rates decline with decreasing temperatures and more unpredictable weather conditions at higher altitudes [111]. Second, flower longevity often increases with altitude [5,6,1217], there being outstanding cases of nival plants with extremely long-lived stigmas [18,19]. The above two trends are considered to be functionally linked, with longer-lived flowers compensating for lower pollination rates at higher elevations [5,6,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longevity of a flower determines the probability and time that it will be visited. Longevity is also an important floral trait that influences the plant reproduction (Primack, 1985;Ashman and Schoen, 1994;Steinacher and Wagner, 2010). The flower of S. chamaejasme can last three to four days even after its functions were lost or became weak (Fig.…”
Section: Floral Traits and Successful Pollinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, prolonged floral longevity can compensate for a low rate of pollinator visitation (Barrett 2003) and can be seen as an evolutionary strategy to overcome a sparse or unpredictable pollinator service (Steinacher & Wagner 2010). In line with this, Darling & Barrett (2011) showed that flowers with longer exposure times had greater chances to be visited by pollinators, as well as a higher reproductive success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%