2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13580-020-00309-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flowering and flowering genes: from model plants to orchids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MdCDF2 was bound and repressed by MdDAM4–MdSVPa, whereas MdLHY was induced by MdDAM1–MdSVPa and repressed by MdDAM4–MdSVPa (Figs 3f , S10 a). In Arabidopsis, LHY and CDFs act in overlapping flowering pathways (Mizoguchi et al ., 2002 ; Renau‐Morata et al ., 2020 ), leading to the activation and accumulation of CONSTANS (CO), which further activates the expression of the floral integrator gene FLOWERING LOCUS T ( FT ) and, consequently, SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 ( SOC1 ) (Andrés & Coupland, 2012 ; Wang et al ., 2021 ). Interestingly, MdSOC1a (MD02G1197400), an ortholog of the Arabidopsis SOC1 gene, was bound and repressed by the MdSVPa homomeric complex (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MdCDF2 was bound and repressed by MdDAM4–MdSVPa, whereas MdLHY was induced by MdDAM1–MdSVPa and repressed by MdDAM4–MdSVPa (Figs 3f , S10 a). In Arabidopsis, LHY and CDFs act in overlapping flowering pathways (Mizoguchi et al ., 2002 ; Renau‐Morata et al ., 2020 ), leading to the activation and accumulation of CONSTANS (CO), which further activates the expression of the floral integrator gene FLOWERING LOCUS T ( FT ) and, consequently, SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 ( SOC1 ) (Andrés & Coupland, 2012 ; Wang et al ., 2021 ). Interestingly, MdSOC1a (MD02G1197400), an ortholog of the Arabidopsis SOC1 gene, was bound and repressed by the MdSVPa homomeric complex (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study, we obtained the sequence of a LFY gene from transcriptome data from the mango cultivar SiJiMi (unpublished data) and, in this study, we further verified the correctness of its sequence by RT–PCR with the primers LFY-F and LFY-R ( Table S1 ). PCR amplification was performed as described in a previous study [ 2 ]. The primers LFY-F and LFY-R were also used to amplify genomic DNA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, much progress has been made in understanding the physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying flowering time in plants. It is clear that plant flowering is mainly affected by various environmental and endogenous signals, such as daylength, temperature, drought, plant age, endogenous phytohormones, and exogenous plant growth regulators (PGRs) [ 1 , 2 ]. A complex gene regulatory network has been revealed in Arabidopsis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, studies on flowering are research hotspot for many model species and crucial horticultural plants [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. In particular, for the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana , several regulators involved in the flowering induction have been identified through studies on the ambient temperature, vernalization, photoperiod, gibberellin (GA), autonomous, age-dependent, circadian clock, and trehalose-6-phosphate (T6P) pathway [ 7 ]. The regulators involved in the aforementioned pathways can integrate signaling transduction and gene interactions, along with the floral integrator genes to facilitate the transition from vegetative to the reproductive meristem, thereby activating the expression of flowering genes including FLOWERING LOCUS C ( FLC ), FLOWERING LOCUS T ( FT ), FRUITFULL ( FUL ), SUPPRESSSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 ( SOC1 ), APETALA1 ( AP1 ), CONSTANS ( CO ), LEAFY ( LFY ), and TARGET OF EAT1 ( TOE1 ) [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%