1994
DOI: 10.2514/3.12024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flowfield measurements in supersonic film cooling including the effect of shock-wave interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy at À0:17 y=S 1:4 may be due to the same reason as shown in Figure 5(a) or due to the interference of shock and expansion waves emanating from the upper tip of the lip in the experiments of Juhany and Hunt. 31 The profiles after x/S = 3 are consistent with those derived from the experiments except for some deviation at x/S = 58, y=S ' 2, which may be due to the shock and expansion waves reflected by the upper wall of the test section. In general, this work provides a good prediction of the flowfield of supersonic film cooling in the experiments of Juhany and Hunt.…”
Section: Validation With the Experimentssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The discrepancy at À0:17 y=S 1:4 may be due to the same reason as shown in Figure 5(a) or due to the interference of shock and expansion waves emanating from the upper tip of the lip in the experiments of Juhany and Hunt. 31 The profiles after x/S = 3 are consistent with those derived from the experiments except for some deviation at x/S = 58, y=S ' 2, which may be due to the shock and expansion waves reflected by the upper wall of the test section. In general, this work provides a good prediction of the flowfield of supersonic film cooling in the experiments of Juhany and Hunt.…”
Section: Validation With the Experimentssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Thus, a three-dimensional simulation with much more complicated turbulence model, such as the work of LES or DNS, is expected in future studies. Figure 6 presents the comparison of the numerical modeled pitot pressure profiles with those described in the experiment of Juhany and Hunt 31 at different streamwise positions after the step to validate the flowfield after the slot. At x/S = 3, the modeled profile matches the measured profile well at À1:17 y=S À0:17, indicating the accurate modeling of the slot flow in the simulation.…”
Section: Validation With the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations