2014
DOI: 10.1002/2013jc009543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flows in the Tasman Front south of Norfolk Island

Abstract: The Tasman Front is a narrow band of eastward flowing subtropical water crossing the Tasman Sea from Australia to North Cape, New Zealand. It is the link between the two subtropical western boundary currents of the South Pacific, the East Australian Current (EAC) off eastern Australia, and the East Auckland Current (EAUC) off northeastern New Zealand. Here we report the first direct measurements of flow in the Tasman Front from a moored array deployed across gaps in the submarine ridges south of Norfolk Island… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(53 reference statements)
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shifting the chosen transect southward or northward upstream of the separation location does not change this distribution. There are no particles in this simulation that originate from a depth deeper than 700 m ending up north of New Zealand while following the Tasman Front, in agreement with the observed values by Sutton and Bowen []. This indicates that whether a particle follows the Tasman Front or the EAC extension (the “fate” of a particle) is to some extent already determined before the EAC bifurcates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shifting the chosen transect southward or northward upstream of the separation location does not change this distribution. There are no particles in this simulation that originate from a depth deeper than 700 m ending up north of New Zealand while following the Tasman Front, in agreement with the observed values by Sutton and Bowen []. This indicates that whether a particle follows the Tasman Front or the EAC extension (the “fate” of a particle) is to some extent already determined before the EAC bifurcates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While transporting heat and biota from the Coral Sea to the Tasman Sea, the EAC separates into an eastward current at approximately 34°S known as the Tasman Front and a southward branch forming the EAC extension [e.g., Godfrey et al ., 1980a; Ridgway and Dunn , ]. Volume transports of both pathways have been previously estimated at ∼9.7 Sv for the extension of the EAC [ Oliver and Holbrook , ] and between −4 and 18 Sv for the Tasman Front [ Sutton and Bowen , ], although the highly variable nature of the pathways' strength and location makes accurate estimates difficult. The EAC current system is highly variable and dynamic, with a ratio of eddy kinetic energy to mean kinetic energy of 500:1 compared to 10:1 in the global average [e.g., Mata et al ., ; Scharffenberg and Stammer , ; Everett et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bias across the Tasman Sea results in a more focused eastward flow and is typical of other modeling studies in the region (Oliver & Holbrook, ; Ypma et al, ). The Tasman Front's observed transport is highly variable and at times westward (Sutton & Bowen, ). Observed in different time periods, across different sections, mean transport estimates vary: 7.6–8.5 Sv (Stanton, ), 12–13 Sv (Stanton, ), 12.9 Sv (Ridgway & Dunn, ), and the first direct measurements by Sutton and Bowen () of 7.8 Sv.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tasman Front's observed transport is highly variable and at times westward (Sutton & Bowen, ). Observed in different time periods, across different sections, mean transport estimates vary: 7.6–8.5 Sv (Stanton, ), 12–13 Sv (Stanton, ), 12.9 Sv (Ridgway & Dunn, ), and the first direct measurements by Sutton and Bowen () of 7.8 Sv. The CTRL experiment Tasman Sea mean outflow of 7.6 Sv (Figure , section GD) is within the range of observed transports.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation