2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00039-020-00534-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flows on the $$\mathbf{PGL(V)}$$-Hitchin Component

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Poisson bracket associated to a surface group has been heavily studied in [10], [25]; and in the context of Hitchin representations the link between the symplectic structure, coordinates and cluster algebras discovered by Fock-Goncharov in [8], has generated a lot of attention: for instance see [23], [20], [24], [7] and [22] for more results, and also relations with the swapping algebra [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Poisson bracket associated to a surface group has been heavily studied in [10], [25]; and in the context of Hitchin representations the link between the symplectic structure, coordinates and cluster algebras discovered by Fock-Goncharov in [8], has generated a lot of attention: for instance see [23], [20], [24], [7] and [22] for more results, and also relations with the swapping algebra [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Xie [Xie13] writes down the same local coordinates (up to a multiplicative factor of 3) for , , , , , as well as the one-honeycomb-webs and . The definition of these local coordinates can be checked experimentally by studying the highest terms of the Fock–Goncharov -trace polynomials; see the introduction as well as [Kim20, Proposition 5.80] (and [Kim21, Proposition 3.15]). Moreover, it appears that these coordinates fit into a broader geometric context [SWZ20, Theorem 8.22(2)]. The coordinates in the -setting are geometric intersection numbers; see the introduction. In contrast, the -coordinates depend on the choice of orientation of . …”
Section: Global Coordinates For Nonelliptic Websmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The merit of this point of view is that one can understand the various invariants geometrically. The enlarged set of coordinates (compared to the N " 2) can then be understood essentially as the statement that there are more projective invariants 22 , besides the cross-ratio, one can define, such as triple ratios [82] (see also [60,[86][87][88][89] and also [49] for an interpretation of the Fenchel-Nielsen length coordinates in terms of projective invariants). From the usual moduli space (4.2) point of view, these describe invariants of the representations ρ : π 1 pΣq Ñ PSLp3, Rq.…”
Section: Higher Genus and Convex Projective Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%