2016
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuating and directional asymmetry in the long bones of captive cotton‐top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus)

Abstract: This first study of DA and FA among multiple dimensions throughout the limbs of a non-hominoid primate suggests that previously-reported patterns of human bilateral asymmetry are not exclusive to humans. The results further indicate potential underlying differences in constraints on variation within limb bones. While processes shaping variation await further study, our results argue that different long bone dimensions may reflect dissimilar evolutionary processes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(127 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar pattern is observed in the bipedal chimpanzee (Sarringhaus, Stock, Marchant, & McGrew, ). However, in a quadrupedal primate that utilizes all four limbs for locomotion, this pattern between forelimbs and hindlimbs does not exist (tamarin; Reeves, Auerbach, & Sylvester, ). Breno, Bots, & Van Dongen () explain that the pattern of directional asymmetry found in rabbits ( FA Hum > FA Fem ), which is consistent with stronger selection against asymmetry in the hindlimbs due to their more prominent role in locomotion, is present in developing fetuses (i.e., prior to incurring loads associated with locomotion) and is therefore under some degree of genetic control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar pattern is observed in the bipedal chimpanzee (Sarringhaus, Stock, Marchant, & McGrew, ). However, in a quadrupedal primate that utilizes all four limbs for locomotion, this pattern between forelimbs and hindlimbs does not exist (tamarin; Reeves, Auerbach, & Sylvester, ). Breno, Bots, & Van Dongen () explain that the pattern of directional asymmetry found in rabbits ( FA Hum > FA Fem ), which is consistent with stronger selection against asymmetry in the hindlimbs due to their more prominent role in locomotion, is present in developing fetuses (i.e., prior to incurring loads associated with locomotion) and is therefore under some degree of genetic control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that our study evaluated Gorilla while Morimoto et al () measured Pan —leaving the possibility of genus‐level differences. Lewton () found only a few differences in the articular morphologies of captive and wild chimpanzees; however, articulations appear to be more genetically canalized during growth than cross‐sectional diaphyseal dimensions (Auerbach & Ruff, ; Lieberman, Devlin, & Pearson, ; Reeves, Auerbach, & Sylvester, ; Trinkaus, Churchill, & Ruff, ). Other studies have shown developmental changes in limb bone diaphyseal proportions among wild chimpanzees related to changes in locomotor behavior (Sarringhaus et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the wide interest in 3D trabecular bone structure and its relationship to dietary, locomotor, and other behaviors in humans and other primates (Ryan and Ketcham, ; Fajardo et al, ; Griffin et al, ; Ryan and Walker, ; Ryan et al, ; Lazenby et al, ; Ryan and Shaw, ; Shaw and Ryan, ; Ryan and Shaw, ; Tsegai et al, ; Schilling et al, ; Skinner et al, ; Reeves et al, ; Stephens et al, ), and studies of ontogenetic changes in trabecular bone (Ryan and Krovitz, ; Gosman and Ketcham, ; Raichlen et al, ), there has been very little study of bilateral asymmetry of trabecular bone in the human skeleton. Lazenby et al () investigated directional asymmetry in the trabecular bone architecture of the adult human second metacarpal from a historic population and found significant right‐side bias in several functionally‐relevant structural variables, including higher bone volume fraction, surface density, trabecular number, connectivity, and more plate‐like trabeculae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%