2016
DOI: 10.3390/sym8110124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuating Asymmetry in Two Common Freshwater Fishes as a Biological Indicator of Urbanization and Environmental Stress within the Middle Chattahoochee Watershed

Abstract: Deviations in bilateral symmetry or fluctuating asymmetry of an organism may result under environmental stressors that reduce developmental homeostasis and stability. Anthropogenic stressors such as increased urbanization can negatively impact environmental quality of aquatic ecosystems. Researchers have stressed the value in finding easy, accurate and inexpensive methods for assessing potential stress within ecosystems. Here we use fluctuating asymmetry (FA) as a useful quantitative tool in assessing the envi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to quantify fluctuating asymmetry in the field and associate variation with environmental conditions including gradients of contamination or urbanization have yielded mixed results ( Nunes, Araújo & Marchini, 2015 ; Weller & Ganzhorn, 2004 ; Lutterschmidt, Martin & Schaefer, 2016 ; Banaszak-Cibicka et al, 2018 ). Indeed, red mason bees ( Osmia bicornis , Linnaeus 1758, Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) collected along a zinc, cadmium, and lead contamination gradient in Poland show no difference in wing size or shape asymmetry ( Szentgyörgyi et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to quantify fluctuating asymmetry in the field and associate variation with environmental conditions including gradients of contamination or urbanization have yielded mixed results ( Nunes, Araújo & Marchini, 2015 ; Weller & Ganzhorn, 2004 ; Lutterschmidt, Martin & Schaefer, 2016 ; Banaszak-Cibicka et al, 2018 ). Indeed, red mason bees ( Osmia bicornis , Linnaeus 1758, Hymenoptera, Megachilidae) collected along a zinc, cadmium, and lead contamination gradient in Poland show no difference in wing size or shape asymmetry ( Szentgyörgyi et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in morphological and morphometric variations cannot be separated from habitat conditions, including intraspecific differences(Hendry et al, 2002 andMcKinnon et al, 2004). Similar studies on different fish species have proved the morphological differences between populations occupying different habitats(Lutterschmidt et al, 2016;Cabuga et al, 2017 andAstuti et al, 2022)…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Cavraro et al, 2019); (2) morphological traits on a long‐term basis (i.e. asymmetry levels) will also reflect the reduction in habitat quality (Almeida et al, 2008; Almeida & Grossman, 2014; Lutterschmidt, Martin & Schaefer, 2016); and (3) parasite communities will be more abundant, but less diverse, under poor environmental conditions (Chapman et al, 2015; Reshu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%