2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuating wind pressure characteristics of heliostats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting pressure difference between top and bottom of the facet leads to high pressure coefficients (c p -values) near the frontal edge (see Fig. 3 and (Gong et al, 2013). The peak differential pressure at the frontal edge leads to the peak overturning moment ( Fig.…”
Section: Wind Loading and Baffle Devices For Their Reductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The resulting pressure difference between top and bottom of the facet leads to high pressure coefficients (c p -values) near the frontal edge (see Fig. 3 and (Gong et al, 2013). The peak differential pressure at the frontal edge leads to the peak overturning moment ( Fig.…”
Section: Wind Loading and Baffle Devices For Their Reductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this study, the pressure coefficients according to Gong et al 27 are adapted and applied in the decisive horizontal position. Therefore, a conservative approach with a constant pressure distribution is applied.…”
Section: Wind Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, DIN EN 1991‐1‐4 permits properly configured wind tunnel experiments to gain coefficients for individual cases. Thus, various wind tunnel tests have been performed, most of them for heliostats with rectangular shapes or parabolic dish collectors . Results are mainly force and moment coefficients c F or coefficient of pressure distributions c p , respectively.…”
Section: Analysis Of Modular Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite recent advances in high-performance computing, the computational effort is still very high, especially for LES. An alternative to performing dynamic analysis on heliostats is to couple the transient FE simulations with experimental data from wind tunnel measurements or full-scale measurements as in (Gong et al, 2013).…”
Section: Dynamic Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%