1986
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2221350122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuation‐induced broadening of exciton reflection spectra in AII BVI solid solutions

Abstract: The validity of different fluctuation models for an explanation of the concentration dependence of exciton reflection line broadening in AIIBvI solid solutions is discussed on the example of Zn,Cdl-,S, Zn,Cdl-,Te, and ZnS,Sel-, systems. It is shown that the concentration dependence can be explained with the help of models describing the interaction of excitons with largescale fluctuations of solid solution composition. At small concentrations of one component of solid solution the model of localization of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strain might be negligible as reported in refs and and explained by an incomplete CdS shell causing a release of the strain. In concern of the band alignments, the current literature provides different data sets, both from theory and experiments. A simple estimate for a possible radial distribution of the electron and hole wave functions in a CdTe/CdS core−shell NC (CdS shell thickness 0.6 nm, CdTe core radius 3.5 nm) is illustrated with the sketch in Figure . For the shown calculation, strain has been neglected and the band parameter of ref are used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strain might be negligible as reported in refs and and explained by an incomplete CdS shell causing a release of the strain. In concern of the band alignments, the current literature provides different data sets, both from theory and experiments. A simple estimate for a possible radial distribution of the electron and hole wave functions in a CdTe/CdS core−shell NC (CdS shell thickness 0.6 nm, CdTe core radius 3.5 nm) is illustrated with the sketch in Figure . For the shown calculation, strain has been neglected and the band parameter of ref are used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In concern of the band alignments, the current literature provides different data sets, both from theory and experiments. A simple estimate for a possible radial distribution of the electron and hole wave functions in a CdTe/CdS core−shell NC (CdS shell thickness 0.6 nm, CdTe core radius 3.5 nm) is illustrated with the sketch in Figure . For the shown calculation, strain has been neglected and the band parameter of ref are used. The most important result for even this very simplified picture is that under certain conditions a CdTe/CdS core-shell NC can develop an indirect-type exciton, i.e., the hole is then predominantly confined to the CdTe core, while the electron is predominantly localized in the CdS shell.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the band alignments of the bulk interface between CdTe/CdS, the current literature provides different data sets, both from theory and experiments. [42][43][44][45] In some data sets, [42,43] the CdTe/CdS interface belongs to a type-I interface (i.e. the bandgap of the core is enclosed by the bandgap of the shell material, and thus, the conduction band of the shell is of higher energy than that of the core, while the valence band of the shell is of lower energy than that of core) whereas in other data sets, [44,45] it belongs to a type-II one [i.e.…”
Section: Optical Properties Of Cdte/cds Core/shell Qdsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The measure of broadening was the halfwidth of the line measured in the standard way (see e.g. [33]) as the distance between the maximum and the minimum in the dispersion gap of the reflection spectrum, taken at halfheight. The concentration dependence of the half-width ( E R ) of the long-wave band in the exciton reflection spectrum at 2 K is shown in figure 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%