2021
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/69nsg
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuations and growth in Ragnar Frisch’s rocking horse model

Abstract: Ragnar Frisch's famous "rocking horse" model has been the object of much praise and even controversy since its publication in 1933. This paper offers a new simulation of the model to show that there exists cyclical trajectories in the propagation mechanism. By building an analytical solution taking the same form as Frisch's original solution, we can provide new insights into the ideas encapsulated in his model, in particular the fact that the author constructed a model combining cycles and growth. The explorat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependence of the quantitative behaviour of Samuelson's 1939 model upon the values of the coefficients of the variables deployed in the equations became increasingly seen as problematic. It indicated to Kydland and Prescott (1991: 165), for instance, that "pure theory was not providing sufficient discipline", which brought into the picture the statistics discipline provided by Tjalling Koopmans 5 See Carret (2021) for a detailed account of the mathematical properties of Frisch's 1933 macrodynamic model. At about the same time, Tinbergen had developed a nonlinear macrodynamic model which he used to shed new light on several policy problems: wage changes, government expenditure and its relation to pump-priming, and the regulation of purchasing power.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependence of the quantitative behaviour of Samuelson's 1939 model upon the values of the coefficients of the variables deployed in the equations became increasingly seen as problematic. It indicated to Kydland and Prescott (1991: 165), for instance, that "pure theory was not providing sufficient discipline", which brought into the picture the statistics discipline provided by Tjalling Koopmans 5 See Carret (2021) for a detailed account of the mathematical properties of Frisch's 1933 macrodynamic model. At about the same time, Tinbergen had developed a nonlinear macrodynamic model which he used to shed new light on several policy problems: wage changes, government expenditure and its relation to pump-priming, and the regulation of purchasing power.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%