1995
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-81932-1.50007-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flue Gas Emissions from Fluidized Bed Combustion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, there were almost no temperature effects on the absorption of HCl in both the fly ash and bed ash from the combustion of this coal. For the high-chlorine coal (95031), both Figures and show that chloride retention is more favorable at low temperatures. ,
3 Effect of bed temperature on the concentration of sulfur in the fly ash of the AFBC system.
4 Effect of bed temperature on the chloride content in the bed ash of the AFBC system.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, there were almost no temperature effects on the absorption of HCl in both the fly ash and bed ash from the combustion of this coal. For the high-chlorine coal (95031), both Figures and show that chloride retention is more favorable at low temperatures. ,
3 Effect of bed temperature on the concentration of sulfur in the fly ash of the AFBC system.
4 Effect of bed temperature on the chloride content in the bed ash of the AFBC system.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, Figure shows that the Ca/S ratio is more important for the capture of chloride compared to sulfur for the high-chlorine-content coal (95031). It is assumed that the HCl is probably captured in the low bed temperature region when the flue gas is passing through the heat exchange tube region because the reaction between HCl and CaO is more favorable at the lower temperature. , The composition of the fly ash (collected from the wet cyclone) in both cases is Ca(OH) 2 , which is due to CaO reacting with water, CaSO 4 , CaCO 3 , and CaCl 2 . This is the only place CaCl 2 was identified in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the stoichiometry of the sulphur capture reaction with calcium oxide, a theoretical limestone feed of one mole calcium per mole of sulphur would be enough for complete sulphur capture. However, the molar volume of the reaction product CaSO 4 is about three times greater than the molar volume of CaO, therefore complete conversion of the adsorbent particle is impossible, because sulphation only proceeds at the outer shell of the CaO particle (Bramer, 1995) and formation of CaSO 4 causes pore mouth closure and reaction stops before all the CaO is consumed by the reaction (Marsh and Ulriehson, 1985). This sulphation pattern is commonly referred to as the unreacted-core model (DamJohansen, 1987;Dam-Johansen et al, 1991;Laursen et al, 2001).…”
Section: Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, it can be seen from Figure 9 that with the increase in CO/O 2 reaction ratio, the ratio of NH 3 to NO increases because the amount of oxygen involved in reaction R2.7 increases with an elevating oxygen concentration, and the Industrial oxidation is difficult to observe. 26,37 Model prediction for the formation of NO and N 2 O from the oxidation of NH 3 in CO/O 2 is shown in Figure 10; the conversion rate of NH 3 into NO is relatively high, and the NO concentration is maintained at 150 ppm even under the condition of 0.5% O 2 concentration. However, under this condition, the prediction of N 2 O is quite different, and only at a lower temperature can about 1 ppm of N 2 O be generated, which needs to be improved.…”
Section: The Homogeneous Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%