Fluency and the Maintenance of Skills Related to Sex Laws for Individuals Adjudicated for Illegal Sexual Behavior

Abstract

Previous research has evaluated the effects of various commonly used mastery criteria on skill maintenance by directly manipulating the accuracy requirement, as well as the sessions across which these accuracy levels must be demonstrated. The current study extends this literature by including a rate dimension within the mastery criterion with a unique population. We implemented a fluency-oriented treatment package to increase intraverbal skills related to state sex laws using a multiple-baseline design across 3 target sets for 2 individuals adjudicated for illegal sexual behavior. Within this intervention package, we included 2 distinct components of a single mastery criterion: (a) accuracy (i.e., 100% accuracy across 3 consecutive sessions) and (b) speed. We evaluated how each of these measurable dimensions of behavior maintained across time. Results indicate this mastery criterion produced over 80% accuracy during maintenance probes for 10 weeks across all sets for both students. However, this mastery criterion produced idiosyncratic maintenance of rates across students and sets. These results suggest that each of these dimensions of behavior does not necessarily covary and should be conceptualized as distinct clinical targets by applied behavior clinicians.

Improving Juvenile Justice Settings by Decreasing Coercion: One Lab’s Perspectives from Behind the Fence

“…As a result, these residents are prevented from advancing to the next level of the ABSOPP curriculum. In a response to this problem, Hamrick, Richling, Davis, et al ( 2021b ) used a fluency procedure to teach residents to respond correctly to questions regarding the state’s sex laws. It is important to note Hamrick, Richling, Davis et al employed mastery criteria that predict long-term maintenance when evaluating students’ performance (Fuller & Fienup, 2018 ; Richling et al, 2019 ).…”

Correspondence between resident‐ and staff‐report on the QABF: Do justice‐involved youth agree with residential staff?

“…(2022) outlined the emerging role of behavior‐analytic services in a specific JRTF. These services have included individual interventions to (a) increase residents' appropriate interactions with correctional staff (Brogan et al., 2021; Niedfeld et al., 2020; O’Rourke et al., 2021), (b) decrease residents' inappropriate and disrespectful verbal behavior while in the JRTF (Brogan et al., 2020), and (c) increase residents' skills for community reintegration (Edgemon, Rapp, Brogan, et al., 2020; Edgemon, Rapp, Coon, et al., 2020; Hamrich, Richling, Davis, et al., 2021). Luna et al.…”