2019
DOI: 10.3390/ma12071062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid Cartilage as New Autologous Biomaterial in the Treatment of Minor Nose Defects: Clinical and Microscopic Difference Amongst Diced, Crushed, and Fluid Cartilage

Abstract: Developing cartilage constructs with injectability, appropriate matrix composition, and persistent cartilaginous phenotype remains an enduring challenge in cartilage repair. Fourteen patients with minor contour deformity were treated with fluid cartilage filler gently injected as autologous fluid graft in deep planes of defect of the nose that were close to the bone or the cartilage. A computerized tomographic scan control was performed after 12 months. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to investigate differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the use of HFSCs and Adipose-Derived follicle Stem Cells, as autologous cellular therapy minimally invasive, that promoting the release of GFs involved in HG, had an important role in the regenerative aspects of HG. Recently, on autologous cellular therapy minimally invasive, many investigations have appeared with the aim to promote regenerative medicine in different fields, additionally over of HR-G [47] for example, with the use of human periodontal stem cells in bone regeneration [48][49][50][51][52], in esthetic soft tissue improvement [53], in wound healing [54][55][56], and in reconstructive purposes [57][58][59][60], widening the horizons of regeneration to hitherto unexplored fields. In every case, as previously discussed, without a standardized use of innovative procedures and also cellular therapies with a specific control quality assessment, regenerative therapies would be difficult if not simply unreliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the use of HFSCs and Adipose-Derived follicle Stem Cells, as autologous cellular therapy minimally invasive, that promoting the release of GFs involved in HG, had an important role in the regenerative aspects of HG. Recently, on autologous cellular therapy minimally invasive, many investigations have appeared with the aim to promote regenerative medicine in different fields, additionally over of HR-G [47] for example, with the use of human periodontal stem cells in bone regeneration [48][49][50][51][52], in esthetic soft tissue improvement [53], in wound healing [54][55][56], and in reconstructive purposes [57][58][59][60], widening the horizons of regeneration to hitherto unexplored fields. In every case, as previously discussed, without a standardized use of innovative procedures and also cellular therapies with a specific control quality assessment, regenerative therapies would be difficult if not simply unreliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The viability of diced cartilage was compared with crushed or morselized cartilage graft in several studies. 16 Diced cartilage has shown superior results with more viable chondrocytes compared with the other two methods of graft preparation. Thus, pieces of cartilage should be diced smaller than 0.2 mm in diameter with sharp blades, and this takes a really long time but is a good investment to prevent complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations include the study being conducted only on Caucasian individuals, which limits the results to this racial group; moreover, it was a single-centre analysis based on a small sample size [ 13 ]. On the other hand, another paper by Trivisonno et al focused on the use of fluid cartilage as a type of nasal filler to fix and repair minor irregularities in the nose dorsum [ 16 ]. However, the disadvantage of this technique is that cartilage may be lost in the dead space of the needle, and there is no estimate of the percentage of cartilage survival, indicating that further procedures may be needed for better result satisfaction.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%