Fluid Dynamics During an Underground Combustion Process

Abstract

Published in Petroleum Transactions, AIME, Volume 213, 1958, pages 146–154. Abstract This paper presents a method of predicting the production history of an underground combustion recovery process. A rigorous solution of the thermodynamics and hydrodynamics involved is beyond the scope of this report. However, a practical scheme to appraise combustion recovery performance has been worked out. By prudent assumptions, regarding the attainment of steady-state conditions, a trial-and-error solution, which satisfies both material balance and three-phase relative permeability requirements has been evolved and tested. As a combustion zone moves through a formation the interstitial water, the water of combustion and a portion of the oil will be vaporized. These vapors will move downstream to a cooler region of the formation where they will condense. Part of the remaining oil will be displaced by the imposed gas drive and what remains behind will be consumed as fuel. The fluids will distribute themselves downstream in a manner which will satisfy the three-phase relative permeability characteristics of the formation. Three distinct zones will exist ahead of the combustion zone:a zone termed a water bank which contains three mobile phases, oil, water and gas;a region containing two mobile phases, oil and gas, called the oil bank; anda zone having the fluid saturation distribution which existed prior to combustion. The mobile water will impose a water flood on the oil in the region containing three flowing phases. The process can be visualized as a simultaneous water flood and combustion-supported gas drive. It is possible to estimate the saturation distributions in the water bank and oil bank as well as the production history for any combustion temperature if the porosity, three-phase relative permeability characteristics, oil viscosity and initial saturations are known. This has been done for injection pressures ranging from 1 to 100 atm, oil viscosities of 10 to 1,000 cp and porosities from 20 to 40 per cent. Several of these calculations have been checked in the laboratory, with the result indicating rather good agreement between the predicted and observed production histories. The analytical and experimental techniques are described and the comparison of predicted and observed performance presented.

Kinetics of in situ combustion. SUPRI TR 91

“…Certain ideas carried over from water flooding were found to be inappropriate to the in-situ combustion process Ramey 1958, 1980;Ramey et al 1992). changes to the fluids in a volume element can be visualized in the following manner (Martin et al 1958, Wilson et al 1958, Tadema 1959, Ramey 1971, Wu and Fulton 1971. As the temperature of the volume element rises, the first liquids to be vaporized are water and light hydrocarbons.…”