2019
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid, energy, and nutrient recovery via ad libitum intake of different commercial beverages and food in female athletes

Abstract: When consumed voluntarily and with food, different beverages promote similar levels of fluid recovery, but alter energy/nutrient intakes. Providing access to food and understanding the longer-term dietary goals of female athletes are important considerations when recommending a recovery beverage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the administration of a CHO-electrolyte sports beverage increased energy (M: ~2.5 MJ, or ~32%; F: ~1.0 MJ, or ~25%) and CHO (M: ~186 g, or ~95%; F: ~73 g, or ~68%) intake, compared to water. The milk-based formulations also increased energy and nutrient provision (to a similar extent observed with the CHO-electrolyte sports beverage for males and to an even greater extent in females); though, these tended to increase ratings of gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort [16][17][18]. Given that in both previous investigations participants were free to leave the laboratory at the end of the recovery period, the extent to which anticipation of a subsequent exercise session influences food/fluid choices requires clarification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, the administration of a CHO-electrolyte sports beverage increased energy (M: ~2.5 MJ, or ~32%; F: ~1.0 MJ, or ~25%) and CHO (M: ~186 g, or ~95%; F: ~73 g, or ~68%) intake, compared to water. The milk-based formulations also increased energy and nutrient provision (to a similar extent observed with the CHO-electrolyte sports beverage for males and to an even greater extent in females); though, these tended to increase ratings of gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort [16][17][18]. Given that in both previous investigations participants were free to leave the laboratory at the end of the recovery period, the extent to which anticipation of a subsequent exercise session influences food/fluid choices requires clarification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Our previous studies investigating post-exercise ad libitum food and fluid consumption behavior have demonstrated significant beverage effects (i.e. Water vs. Sports Drink) on total CHO intake in males (Cohen's dZ=2.7) [16] and females (dZ=2.1) [17]. Using a power (1-β) of 0.95, an a=0.01 and a more conservative effect size (dZ=2.0), we anticipated that 8 male and 8 female subjects would be required to create a significant difference in CHO ingestion (i.e.…”
Section: Participant Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations