2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10665-023-10283-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid-flow effects in the reactive decontamination of porous materials driven by chemical swelling or contraction

Abstract: Following the release of a chemical warfare agent, it is crucial for public health that the affected environment is entirely decontaminated. If the agent has seeped into a porous building material, the decontamination is achieved by applying a cleanser solution to the surface of the porous material, and allowing it to react in, neutralising the agent. Typically, the agent and cleanser solution are immiscible fluids and so the reaction occurs at the fluid–fluid interfaces within the pores. Previous studies have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the sharp-interface case, such a flow in the cleanser phase might be incorporated into the homogenised model using a similar analysis to that developed for an evaporation front in [11]. The effect of such a flow is investigated in [7] for the sharp-interface case, but it is not clear what the effect would be on solutions of the agent-on-walls model. Finally, we have assumed two highly idealised agent distributions in the pore space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sharp-interface case, such a flow in the cleanser phase might be incorporated into the homogenised model using a similar analysis to that developed for an evaporation front in [11]. The effect of such a flow is investigated in [7] for the sharp-interface case, but it is not clear what the effect would be on solutions of the agent-on-walls model. Finally, we have assumed two highly idealised agent distributions in the pore space.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation of dirt across the interface is given by where is the normal velocity of the depositing/eroding interface. We note that, in order that there is no flow generated at the depositing interface, we assume that the dirt and liquid have the same mass density, so that the total mixture density is the same on either side of the depositing/eroding interface, while the dirt and liquid fractions can jump (see, for instance, Geng, Kamilova & Luckins 2023).…”
Section: Model Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%