2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2014.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid hydrodynamic characteristics in supercritical water fluidized bed: A DEM simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was obvious that both the non-spherical particle drag model and the Gidaspow drag model predicted a transformation process from homogeneous fluidization to the bubbling zone. These simulated results were consistent with those in the literature (Lu et al, 2014). However, the nonspherical particle drag model predicted a smaller superficial velocity for bubble occurrence than the Gidaspow drag model.…”
Section: Bed Expansion Predicted By Gidaspow and Non-sphere Particle supporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was obvious that both the non-spherical particle drag model and the Gidaspow drag model predicted a transformation process from homogeneous fluidization to the bubbling zone. These simulated results were consistent with those in the literature (Lu et al, 2014). However, the nonspherical particle drag model predicted a smaller superficial velocity for bubble occurrence than the Gidaspow drag model.…”
Section: Bed Expansion Predicted By Gidaspow and Non-sphere Particle supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Vogt et al (2005b) found the bubbles in supercritical CO 2 fluidized bed are quite small. The bubbling phenomenon has been observed in the SCW fluidized bed by a DEM study (Lu et al, 2014). Fig.…”
Section: Bed Expansion Predicted By Gidaspow and Non-sphere Particle mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation results were compared to concerned experimental and numerical results published in the literature. 18,19 Numerical method…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination drag of the non-spherical particle drag model and the Ergun equation has been validated by comparing experimental data of the SCWFB. More recently, Lu et al [20,21] studied the fluidization process of Geldart Group B particles in SCW by a CFD-DEM model. Fluidization transition of fixed-homogeneous-bubbling zone was observed in the simulation work.…”
Section: Simulation Advancementioning
confidence: 99%