2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04685-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid restriction in management of patent ductus arteriosus in Italy: a nationwide survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For premature infants undergoing conservative treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), water restriction is a commonly used method (27)(28)(29)(30)(31). However, there is no consensus on the amount of water needed to maintain the infant's nutrition and needs while also treating PDA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For premature infants undergoing conservative treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), water restriction is a commonly used method (27)(28)(29)(30)(31). However, there is no consensus on the amount of water needed to maintain the infant's nutrition and needs while also treating PDA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there are significant variations in PDA management among different countries, regions, and hospitals (5,16,(23)(24)(25)(26). Conservative treatment, such as fluid restriction, is one way to manage PDA (27)(28)(29)(30)(31), but evaluating fluid status in premature infants is challenging, and fluid management strategies and incubator humidity settings vary among hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is driven by concerns over unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions, without demonstrated benefits other than ductal closure itself [ 7 ]. This approach includes a variety of actions, including positive pressure for respiratory support, mild fluid restriction [ 9 ], selective diuretic use, avoiding anemia and providing adequate nutrition until the duct is no longer hemodynamically significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%