1985
DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(85)90007-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid-sorption phenomena in sterilized polyethylene acetabular prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…55 This was 50% higher than our nonirradiated soak cups (Table III) and clearly was a consequence of the 20 -30-kGy sterilization. Dynamic loading of the nonirradiated cups raised the absorption rates by 80%, and irradiating the cups to 500 -1500 kGy increased the absorption rates by a further 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…55 This was 50% higher than our nonirradiated soak cups (Table III) and clearly was a consequence of the 20 -30-kGy sterilization. Dynamic loading of the nonirradiated cups raised the absorption rates by 80%, and irradiating the cups to 500 -1500 kGy increased the absorption rates by a further 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Figure 8. Increased UHMWPE fluid-absorption effects following 25-kGy radiation, as measured over 5 years of storage in various environments 55 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre‐wear study of 42 days immersion was designed to stabilize the weight of polyethylene implants with regard to standard cleaning and weighing cycles used during the 180‐day wear study 35. This is the soak test before wear test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravimetric method of wear assessment had the advantage that creep or cold flow in the UHMWPE inserts was not an issue. The disadvantage was that any weight changes due to fluid absorption into the UHMWPE should be compensated for 35. All tibial inserts were soaked in double‐distilled water 42 days prior to the wear study and cleaned periodically to assess weight trends (Sartorius Micro‐Balance: precision ±0.01 mg: ASTM F1714‐96).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wear assessment of total hip replacements (THR) is most commonly achieved by weight‐loss measurements. However, such gravimetric assessments have to account for various artifacts such as inadvertent flaking or chipping at interfaces, fluid absorption by polymer inserts, lubricant penetration into various crevices as well as proteinaceous and mineral coatings on the implant surfaces 1–5. For wear assessment of modular metal and ceramic balls there is a unique complication of metal transfer between the trunnion and the implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%