2022
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid–structure interaction analysis of eccentricity and leaflet rigidity on thrombosis biomarkers in bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements

Abstract: This work introduces the first 2-way fluid-structure interaction (FSI) computational model to study the effect of aortic annulus eccentricity on the performance and thrombogenic risk of cardiac bioprostheses. The model predicts that increasing eccentricities yield lower geometric orifice areas (GOAs) and higher normalized transvalvular pressure gradients (TPGs) for healthy cardiac outputs during systole, agreeing with in vitro experiments. Regions with peak values of residence time and shear rate are observed … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, Equation (10) is the definition of the distance d W that is used in the first term of the cost function (Equation ( 8)). The second term of the cost function is a penalization term to avoid deformations with high "kinetic" energy, 30 where B 0,i is the N cp  3 matrix of momenta belonging to target geometry…”
Section: Theory Behind the Statistical Shape Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, Equation (10) is the definition of the distance d W that is used in the first term of the cost function (Equation ( 8)). The second term of the cost function is a penalization term to avoid deformations with high "kinetic" energy, 30 where B 0,i is the N cp  3 matrix of momenta belonging to target geometry…”
Section: Theory Behind the Statistical Shape Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In silico trials could possibly speed up the clinical introduction of improved TAVI devices. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and fluid–structure interaction (FSI) models are typically used to simulate aortic valve dynamics before, 7,8 and after treatment 9–13 . Furthermore, finite element methods can be used to simulate contact forces between the aortic root and the TAVI valve during deployment 14–16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In principle, these can be treated by considering a structural model for the solid (leaflets of the valve and possibly its chordae tendinae) and a fluid dynamics model for the surrounding blood flow. This approach yields a coupled FSI model of the blood-valve system [24,[62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70], characterized by contact phenomena and fast dynamics. Thus, FSI valve models are commonly associated to a huge computational burden, to be added to the overall cost of the heart CFD simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 To avoid the need of a complete remeshing of the computational domain, while maintaining a sharp description of the valve surface, different XFEM/cutFEM methods have been proposed, [42][43][44][45][46][47][48] but their use to simulate cardiac flows at the organ scale has been limited by their relatively high computational cost. On the other hand, fully Eulerian approaches, such as the immersed boundary method, [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] the fictitious domain method [58][59][60][61][62][63][64] or the Resistive Immersed Implicit Surface (RIIS) method, 21,65 hinge upon an implicit representation of the leaflets and do not require mesh conformity between the fluid domain and the valves. This allows to track the fluid-valve interface, possibly moving in time, without requiring the fluid mesh to follow the valve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%