HEDH Multimedia
DOI: 10.1615/hedhme.a.000172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid-to-particle heat transfer in fluidized beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 13 shows a comparison of the measured heat transfer coefficients with the predictions of the packet model, using residence/ contact times measured using PEPT, and the correlation for the maximum obtainable heat transfer coefficient from Zabrodsky (1966), and showing fair agreement. The measured heat transfer coefficient at the highest gas velocity/shortest residence time is well below the packet model predictions, presumably because blanketing of the heat transfer surface reduces heat transfer under these conditions.…”
Section: Heat Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Fig. 13 shows a comparison of the measured heat transfer coefficients with the predictions of the packet model, using residence/ contact times measured using PEPT, and the correlation for the maximum obtainable heat transfer coefficient from Zabrodsky (1966), and showing fair agreement. The measured heat transfer coefficient at the highest gas velocity/shortest residence time is well below the packet model predictions, presumably because blanketing of the heat transfer surface reduces heat transfer under these conditions.…”
Section: Heat Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For studies of heat transfer coefficients in drying systems in the period of constant drying rate, it can be assumed that the temperature of the surface particles T p,s is equal to the wet bulb temperature T wb of the inlet air [14,15], since in such a period the product shows a wet surface.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Gas-particle Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gunn1 and Kato et al2 showed that the Sherwood number for large particles is equal to the diffusion limit of two plus the convection conveyed in terms of the Reynolds and Schmidt numbers. However, the Sherwood numbers for fine particles are known to be much smaller than those for large particles 3–5. Breault6 and Breault and Guenther7 reviewed that the Sherwood number varies by at least seven orders of magnitude in the literature, i.e., from 10 −5 to 10 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%