2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluid volume, fluid balance and patient outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
57
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though insufficient fluid resuscitation can decrease tissue perfusion and affect mortality, a growing body of evidence suggests that, in septic shock, excessive fluid administration might be harmful [4][5][6][7]. Furthermore, only half of patients respond to fluid challenges with increases in cardiac output [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though insufficient fluid resuscitation can decrease tissue perfusion and affect mortality, a growing body of evidence suggests that, in septic shock, excessive fluid administration might be harmful [4][5][6][7]. Furthermore, only half of patients respond to fluid challenges with increases in cardiac output [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that the compliance with the SSC has been associated with improved outcomes [2,3], aggressive fluid administration and its consequence of volume overload can increase the mortality of septic patients [4][5][6][7]. Given that both insufficient and excessive administration of solutions might be harmful, fluid management in sepsis should be carefully optimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation is a necessary tool to improve hemodynamic stability and organ perfusion and possibly decrease mortality in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) [1,2]. However, the benefit of continued fluid administration after the first 24-48 h is unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only 40-50% of patients with unstable haemodynamics can benefit from fluid therapy (3). On the other hand, fluid overload is associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients (4). Therefore, much attention is being paid to the assessment of fluid responsiveness, i.e., the response of cardiac output (CO) or stroke volume (SV) to fluid challenge (FC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%