Shock Waves 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85181-3_76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluidic control of cavity configurations at transonic and supersonic speeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For cavities inside aircrafts utilized to store weapons, the maximum sound pressure level (SPL) can be 170dB [1], which damage components of aircrafts and disturb safety separation of storing weapons. Therefore, Many experimental and numerous investigations have been conducted over the past several decades to study cavity static and unsteady flow characteristics [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. These results indicate that there were complex flow-field structure and aerodynamic noise characteristics inside cavities at transonic and supersonic flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For cavities inside aircrafts utilized to store weapons, the maximum sound pressure level (SPL) can be 170dB [1], which damage components of aircrafts and disturb safety separation of storing weapons. Therefore, Many experimental and numerous investigations have been conducted over the past several decades to study cavity static and unsteady flow characteristics [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. These results indicate that there were complex flow-field structure and aerodynamic noise characteristics inside cavities at transonic and supersonic flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In order to suppress the aerodynamic noise of open cavities, a large number of active and passive flow control studies have been carried out by domestic and foreign scholars [7][8] . Active control methods such as mass jet or boundary layer blowing [9][10] have limitations from the engineering application point of view because of the need to add additional devices and complex structure; in contrast, passive control has no auxiliary energy consumption, easy application, more reliable performance and strong engineering practicality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%