2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.04.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluidized bed with a rotating distributor operated under defluidization conditions

Abstract: h i g h l i g h t sThe capability of a rotating distributor to recover a defluidized bed was analyzed. Defluidization was reached by injecting a punctual volume of water on the bed surface. Fluidization and recovery processes were analyzed in the time and frequency domain. An excellent agreement was found for the time and frequency domain results. The rotating distributor improves the fluidization quality of a defluidized bed. Keywords: Fluidized bed Liquid injection Defluidization Rotating distributor a b s t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic features of the fluidized bed were then modified by varying the bed aspect ratio, h b /D ¼0.75, 1.5 and 2. In these tests, the relative fluidization velocity was constant at U r ¼1.6, where the bed was shown to be well-fluidized (Gómez-Hernández et al, 2012). The effect of the pressure probe location and the influence of the pressure sensor type were also analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The dynamic features of the fluidized bed were then modified by varying the bed aspect ratio, h b /D ¼0.75, 1.5 and 2. In these tests, the relative fluidization velocity was constant at U r ¼1.6, where the bed was shown to be well-fluidized (Gómez-Hernández et al, 2012). The effect of the pressure probe location and the influence of the pressure sensor type were also analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these tests, the aspect ratio was fixed at h b /D¼ 0.75, and the fluidization velocity was U r ¼1.6. According to Gómez-Hernández et al (2012), the tests started with the bed working without the presence of agglomerates, i.e., nominal conditions. Then, 150 ml of water was injected on the surface of the bed, at a distance of 1 m perpendicular to the distributor, causing defluidization of the bed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations