2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-8981(00)00374-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence-based method for measuring and determining the mechanisms of recombination in quantitative PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, to explore the notion that secondary structure in the template DNA was contributing to our results, we repeated both the E. coli rRNA and the seal mRNA using standard PCRs in the presence of DMSO and determined the rf values. DMSO is often used in PCR specifically to render amplifiable difficult templates, such as those with secondary structure (20,21). However, DMSO did not noticeably lower the rf in either system (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, to explore the notion that secondary structure in the template DNA was contributing to our results, we repeated both the E. coli rRNA and the seal mRNA using standard PCRs in the presence of DMSO and determined the rf values. DMSO is often used in PCR specifically to render amplifiable difficult templates, such as those with secondary structure (20,21). However, DMSO did not noticeably lower the rf in either system (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commercially available AMV and MMlV reverse transcriptase have the ability to switch from one template to another resulting in recombinant DNA artefacts (9,10). In addition, thermostable polymerases generate artificial recombinant fragments by template switching (11)(12)(13)(14). Thus, any amplified PCR product deviated from the anticipated ones should be considered with great caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…targeted mutagenesis or targeted gene repair of cells. [Liu et al, 1997a;Barnard et al, 1998] Number of thermal cycles and amount of templates in PCR and/or + + Correction factor (k) SNuPE reaction [Liu et al, 1997b;Shammas et al, 2001] Non-linearity of peak heights on a LIF-CE instrument +/-+ Calibration curve Biased PCR and/or SNuPE amplification towards one allele due to -+ Calibration curve unequal amount of allele-specific templates [Walsh et al, 1992] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%