1987
DOI: 10.1364/josab.4.000337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluorescence emission at dielectric and metal-film interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
239
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
239
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluorescence collection factor Q(z), as defined by Hellen and Axelrod (29), captures the well established phenomenon that a radiating fluorophore near a high refractive index substrate exhibits altered fluorescence that depends on its distance from the interface (30,31). This phenomenon is attributed to two effects (29,32): (i) interference between emitted light propagating directly from the radiating dipole and light that is reflected from the material interface; and (ii) power dissipation into the high refractive index material as the radiating dipole is closer to the interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fluorescence collection factor Q(z), as defined by Hellen and Axelrod (29), captures the well established phenomenon that a radiating fluorophore near a high refractive index substrate exhibits altered fluorescence that depends on its distance from the interface (30,31). This phenomenon is attributed to two effects (29,32): (i) interference between emitted light propagating directly from the radiating dipole and light that is reflected from the material interface; and (ii) power dissipation into the high refractive index material as the radiating dipole is closer to the interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluorescence collection factor Q(z), as defined by Hellen and Axelrod (29), captures the well established phenomenon that a radiating fluorophore near a high refractive index substrate exhibits altered fluorescence that depends on its distance from the interface (30,31). This phenomenon is attributed to two effects (29,32): (i) interference between emitted light propagating directly from the radiating dipole and light that is reflected from the material interface; and (ii) power dissipation into the high refractive index material as the radiating dipole is closer to the interface. The model developed for the collection factor by Hellen and Axelrod considers a constant-amplitude oscillating dipole at a three-layer interface composed of two semiinfinite, nonattenuating dielectric regions 1 (the aqueous media) and 3 (the lithium niobate) with indices of refraction of n 1 and n 3 , respectively, separated by an intermediate region 2 (the SiO 2 spacer) with index of refraction of n 2 and thickness l. The radiating dipole is located in region 1 at a distance z from the region 2-3 interface, and its transition dipole moment is oriented with polar angle ⌰ relative to the surface normal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without deposition of the phosphonate polymer, neutravidin bound to both the fused silica and the aluminum surfaces with high densities. Fluorescence from the beads was enhanced by the proximity of the metal (25,26), resulting in higher signal levels from the aluminum surface regions. In contrast, excellent bias of neutravidin adsorption toward the fused silica surface was observed for PVPA-treated samples, translating to very few biotinylated beads detectable by fluorescence microscopy on the aluminum surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where a fluorophore is very close to the cover slip, its emitted near-field can interact with the surface and be converted into propagating light [8,9]. This near-field component is predominantly seen as "supercritical" emission (i.e.…”
Section: Emission Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-The information contained in the supercritical emission can be used to measure molecular orientations, distance from the surface, and thickness of intermediate layers [8,11]. -Near the surface, the majority of the emitted light is emitted into the glass, further enhancing the efficiency of detection of molecules in an objective TIRF configuration (see Section 3.4) [9].…”
Section: Emission Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%